(Eleven )Aug.2006 Emergency Motion of Disqualifation of Judge Latreille and Attorney Grievance Letters

STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE 44th JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT OF (LIVINGSTON COUNTY)
210 S. HIGHLANDER WAY, HOWELL, MICHIGAN, 48843 (517-546-9816)

GEORGE EDWARD LYONS HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE
P.O.BOX 226 Case no. 06-021758-CZ
PINCKNEY, MICHIGAN 48169
734-424-9335
PLAINTIFF
-V-
RONALD STORZBACH AND VIRGINIA STORZBACH H/W
7709 PARTRIDGE HILL,
Brighton, Michigan 48116
Moved to: 912 Sandwedge Court
Bowling Green,KY 42103-2508
UNKNOWN
DEFENDANTS

Richard Friberg and Ann Friberg H/W
5640 Shoshoni Pass
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
540-823-3271
Moved to: 19385 Briar Patch Drive
Gordonville, Va. 22942-7564

DEFENDANTS

David Feeback and Carrie Feeback H/W
10932 Whitewood
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-878-1064 DEFENDANTS

Curt Lalonde and Mary Ann Lalonde H/W
3100 Crystal Springs Lane aka 3100 Betty Lyons Lane
Pinckney, Hamburg Township, Michigan 48189
734-878-2278 DEFENDANTS
734-878-2279

PROOF OF SERVICE

George Edward Lyons says that he on October 17, 2006, served true copies of: A Plaintiff Objection to Summary Disposition Judgment and 7 day notice. Plaintiff’s Motion for Disqualification of Judge Laterille: And Demand for a Stay until review or investigation by the Judicial Tenure of Michigan. These Documents were Hand Delivered to the office of DEFENDANTS ATTORNEY, NEAL D. NIELSEN AT 2000 Grand River Annex, and Suite 200 Brighton, Michigan 48114.

I DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE, AND BELIEF

RESPECTFULLY

_______________________________________
George Edward Lyons P.O.Box 226 Pinckney, Michigan 48169 734-657-1679

NEAL D. NEILSEN REPRESENTATIVE ______________________________ ______________Date



STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE 44th JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT OF (LIVINGSTON COUNTY)
210 S. HIGHLANDER WAY, HOWELL, MICHIGAN, 48843 (517-546-9816)

GEORGE EDWARD LYONS HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE
P.O.BOX 226 Case no. 06-021758-CZ
PINCKNEY, MICHIGAN 48169
734-424-9335
PLAINTIFF
-V-

RONALD STORZBACH AND VIRGINIA STORZBACH H/W
7709 PARTRIDGE HILL,
Brighton, Michigan 48116
Moved to: 912 Sandwedge Court
Bowling Green,KY 42103-2508
UNKNOWN
DEFENDANTS

Richard Friberg and Ann Friberg H/W
5640 Shoshoni Pass
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
540-823-3271
Moved to: 19385 Briar Patch Drive
Gordonville, Va. 22942-7564

DEFENDANTS

David Feeback and Carrie Feeback H/W
10932 Whitewood
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-878-1065 DEFENDANTS

Curt Lalonde and Mary Ann Lalonde H/W
3100 Crystal Springs Lane aka 3100 Betty Lyons Lane
Pinckney, Hamburg Township, Michigan 48189
734-878-2280 DEFENDANTS
734-878-2281



EMERGENCY MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE
AND DENYING SUMMARY DISPOSITION OF DEFENDANT’S AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO REMOVAL ALL CLAIMS, AND PLACING ALL CASES ON STAY UNDER INVESTIGATION OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL TENURE INVESTIGATION AND OTHER INVESTIGATOR’S


Plaintiff George E. Lyons makes this motion and says:

1. Within the past (14) days, Plaintiff has become aware of facts giving Rise to disqualification and therefore this motion has been brought in a proper, timely manner under MCR 2.003 et seq.

2. This Honorable Court and other legal representatives cannot impartially hear any matter involving this case because:

3. That his Honor Stanley Laterille is being called on a witness in this case.

4. Also being called as witness is Attorney Charles Wedmaier and his company Harris & Laterski, at

a. This Court and other legal representatives is biased or prejudiced for or against either or both of the parties to this action, and biased in favor of past/present Defendant’s. Defendant’s attorney, which is disqualifying under MCR 2.003(B) (2);

b. This Honorable Court and other legal representatives are disqualified by law for numerous other reasons under the provisions of MCR 2.003(B) (7).

1. That this Honorable Court and other legal representatives and all other Livingston County judicial or Circuit officers and court personnel should be disqualified from acting upon, hearing, deciding or otherwise participating in any further disposition of this case in any manner, except to disqualify as requested; as required by MCR 2.003(B) (2) and to disqualify as requested; as required by MCR 2.003 (B) (2) and or MCR 2.003 (B) (7), the grounds for which are stated herein are stated herein and in the attached affidavit.

2. That per Plaintiff Witness List the following are included.

5. Charles Widmaier (P-38376) Material Witness Live
Attorney for the Defendants confirm audio
822 E. Grand River Avenue
Brighton, Michigan
(810-229-9340)

ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANTS

6. Employee’s of Harris & Literski Material Witness Live
317 E. Grand River confirm audio
Brighton, Michigan 48116

JUDGES;

9. All Judge’s of Livingston County Material Witness Live
Court system District / Circuit confirm audios
And all employee’s

. Honorable Judge Burress Material witness Live

58. Honorable Judge Hagerty Material witness Live

59. Honorable Judge Latreille Material witness Live

60. Honorable Judge Reader Material witness Live

61. Honorable Judge Delvero Material witness Live

62. Honorable Judge Reck Material witness Live

63. Honorable Judge Pickeranin Material witness Live

All employees of Livingston Material witness Live
County.

64. Magistrate Brown Material witness Live

And if the above would follow under conflict of Interest, and are not used as witnesses in this case and others cases that are being filed in the near future.

The July 10, 1995 amendments of MCR 2.003, and Rules 3A, 3D, 6C, and 7B of the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct, and new MCR 9.227 and Rule 7D of the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct, are based on the proposed revision of the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct submitted by the State Bar Representative Assembly. See 442 Mich 1216 (1993). They are effective September 1, 1995.

(3) Ruling. The challenged judge shall decide the motion. If the challenged judge denies the motion,

(a) In a court having two or more judges, on the request of a party, the challenged judge shall refer the motion to the chief judge, who shall decide the motion de novo;

(b) In a single-judge court, or if the challenged judge is the chief judge, on the request of a party, the challenged judge shall refer the motion to the state court administrator for assignment to another judge, who shall decide the motion de novo.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully request:

A. That this motion be granted; and,
B. That this matter be thereafter transferred to the State Court Administrator’s office for reassignment to wherefore another circuit as required by MCR 2.003 et seq.

ALTERNATIVE, IF THIS MOTION IS DENIED, Plaintiff respectfully demands;

A. That this motion be referred and transferred the 44th Circuit Court Chief Judge for a de nova hearing and /or other or further proceedings MCR. 2003 et seq.,

B. That this Honorable Court to set aside any and all judgments and refrain from taking any further actions on this case during the pendency of said disqualification proceedings, as required under MCR 2.003 et seq., and

C. That this Court refrain from taking any further action on this case during the tendency of said disqualification proceedings, except those ministerial action necessary to comply with applicable statutes, court rules and case law.

Procedure:

Proper procedure for handling a motion to disqualify is well established and was recently summarized in Czuprynski v Bay 1 2 follows:

“The procedure for disqualification of a trial judge . . . which was formerly provided by statute is now provided by court rule. MCR 2.003 generally, that procedure is exclusive and must be followed. “10/31.

: MCR 2.003 provides that a party or attorney seeking disqualification must file a written motion supported by an affidavit of facts and including all know grounds for disqualification. The Judge complained of then holds a hearing and decides the motion. If the motion is denied, then the party or attorney may refer the motion to the chief judge who must decide the motion de novo on the record 32/33



Respectfully submitted this October 17, 2006

By: __________________________________
George E. Lyons, Plaintiff
P.O.Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679




STATE OF Michigan
IN THE 44th JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT OF (LIVINGSTON COUNTY)
210 S. HIGHLANDER WAY, HOWELL, MICHIGAN, 48843


STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE 44th JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT OF (LIVINGSTON COUNTY)
210 S. HIGHLANDER WAY, HOWELL, MICHIGAN, 48843 (517-546-9816)

GEORGE EDWARD LYONS HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE
P.O.BOX 226 Case no. 06-021758-CZ
PINCKNEY, MICHIGAN 48169
734-657-1679
PLAINTIFF
-V-
RONALD STORZBACH AND VIRGINIA STORZBACH H/W
7709 PARTRIDGE HILL,
Brighton, Michigan 48116
Moved to: 912 Sandwedge Court
Bowling Green,KY 42103-2508
UNKNOWN
DEFENDANTS
Richard Friberg and Ann Friberg H/W
5640 Shoshoni Pass
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
540-823-3271
Moved to: 19385 Briar Patch Drive
Gordonville, Va. 22942-7564
DEFENDANTS
David Feeback and Carrie Feeback H/W
10932 Whitewood
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-878-1066 DEFENDANTS

Curt Lalonde and Mary Ann Lalonde H/W
3100 Crystal Springs Lane aka 3100 Betty Lyons Lane
Pinckney, Hamburg Township, Michigan 48189
734-878-2282 DEFENDANTS
734-878-2283

AFFIDAVIT SUPPORTING EMERGENCY MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION
AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO REMOVAL OF ALL CLAIMS OF THE DEFENDANT’S, AND PLACING THIS CASE ON STAY UNDER INVESTIGATION OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL TENURE INVESTIGATION.

Plaintiff George E. Lyons, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the following facts are true to the best of his personal knowledge; or are based on information and belief, and as to those he believes them to be true; and if sworn as a witness in this matter he would competently testify and produce other evidence to conclusively prove as follows:

1. HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE, and other legal representatives, and on information and belief, has numerous personal contacts and acquaintances among all of Livingston County judges, court clerks, other court employees and personnel.

2. HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE, and other legal representatives, these allegations beginning many years ago, became directly, indirectly, regularly and routinely involved and enmeshed with all Livingston County and Washtenaw judges and other court personnel in numerous legal, political, fraternal and social organizations. Structures and activities; all of which on information and belief, has provided and continues to provide numerous opportunities for judicial and extra-judicial ex-parte contacts with Livingston County and Washtenaw judicial officers and other court personnel.

3. Plaintiff believes that the HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE and
other legal representatives, acting herein, has and will actively use his/ and their long-time positions, influence, access to judges and access to court records: to make ex-parte contacts with members of the Livingston County bench and /or their employees in attempts to create bias in defendant’s favor; to surreptitiously remove materials from court records to which Plaintiff is a party; and to otherwise deprive Plaintiff of his rights to due process in this case in any manner possible.

4. On information and belief, HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE and
Other legal representatives, for past clients has already used his status and connections to misinform and intimidate potential attorneys for defendants in this case and thereby effectively deprived Plaintiff of legal representation herein.

5. Plaintiff believes that, from it inception, Defendant’s and other past clients has been given special considerations in the handling and treatment of the instant case by 44th Livingston county Circuit court and personnel, due to bias in favor of Defendant’s and their attorney.

6. HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE, and other legal representatives, herein is inextricably involved and enmeshed in numerous judicial and extra-judicial matters which include, in general, all Livingston County judicial and circuit officers and other court personnel.

7. All members of the Livingston Judicial and Circuit County bench would have a natural inclination or tendency, if sitting in judgment, to be biased in favor of Defendant’s and/or against Plaintiff due to the status and judicial connections of Defendant’s counsel and past attorney’s.

8. HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE and other legal representatives, has too many opportunities, and is of a mind, and has already undertaken, to improperly engage in ex-parte communications with Livingston County Judicial and Circuit court judges relative to this case; And the has repeatedly representation of Due to the circumstances and relationship existing between the HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE and other legal representatives, and all judicial and Circuit court officers in Livingston County; Plaintiff believes he cannot get a fair trial or hearing in this county.

9. Plaintiff has presented to this court, and other courts evidence to support the removal of this Case No’s. 06-021758-CZ,STORZBACH,FRIBERG,LALONDE’S AND FEEBACK’S 04-020652 KOPP’S AND 04-021106-CK Marcich’s to a de nova hearing to the State of Michigan Administration Hearing to be transfer to another circuit court.

10. Defendant George E. Lyons hereby swears under penalty of perjury that all facts stated in the forgoing Affidavit In Support of Emergency Motion for Disqualification and Denying Summary Disposition of the Defendant’s are true to the best of his personal knowledge or stated on information and belief, and as to those facts he believes them to be true.



By: _____________________________
George E. Lyons, Plaintiff
Subscribed and sworn to before me
This_______day of ___________. 2006

Notary Public: ____________________________.




STATE OF Michigan
IN THE 44th JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT OF (LIVINGSTON COUNTY)
210 S. HIGHLANDER WAY, HOWELL, MICHIGAN, 48843


STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE 44th JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT OF (LIVINGSTON COUNTY)
210 S. HIGHLANDER WAY, HOWELL, MICHIGAN, 48843 (517-546-9816)

GEORGE EDWARD LYONS HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATREILLE
P.O.BOX 226 Case no. 06-021758-CZ
PINCKNEY, MICHIGAN 48169
734-424-9335
PLAINTIFF
-V-
RONALD STORZBACH AND VIRGINIA STORZBACH H/W
7709 PARTRIDGE HILL,
Brighton, Michigan 48116
Moved to: 912 Sandwedge Court
Bowling Green,KY 42103-2508
UNKNOWN
DEFENDANTS
Richard Friberg and Ann Friberg H/W
5640 Shoshoni Pass
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
540-823-3271
Moved to: 19385 Briar Patch Drive
Gordonville, Va. 22942-7564
DEFENDANTS
David Feeback and Carrie Feeback H/W
10932 Whitewood
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-878-1067 DEFENDANTS

Curt Lalonde and Mary Ann Lalonde H/W
3100 Crystal Springs Lane aka 3100 Betty Lyons Lane
Pinckney, Hamburg Township, Michigan 48189
734-878-2284 DEFENDANTS
734-878-2285

BRIEF MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION

DISQUALIFICATION LAW AND ARGUMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY DISPOSITION JUDGMENT AND 7 DAY NOTICE. AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO REMOVAL OF ALL CLAIMS OF THE DEFENDANT’S. AND PLACING ALL CASES ON STAY UNTIL AFTER INVESTIGATION OF THE JUDICIAL TENURE INVESTIGATION OR OTHER INVESTGATOR’S


DISQUALIFICATION LAW AND ARGUMENT

These underlying principles of disqualification law are well settled. What the Michigan Supreme Court said almost 125 years ago in Stockton v Township Board is and Peninsular Railway v Howard, it remains valid and binding today:

“It Is among the First objects of civil government, to deprive persons of the power in adjudge finally for themselves, and conclusively assert their own causes; and so fundamental is this rule of justice, so essential to the order, peace, and even stability of government, that however broad the terms of a grant of judicial power may be, this principle remains operative, and gives rise to a tacit exception from the general words of the grant’s…The principle … asserts itself wherever judicial powers are employed by a body appointed by law…the rule is not confined to cases where the person is both judge and party. The principle… applies to the elements and substance of the controversy, and in general, where the case is of such a nature as to make it necessary, in its course or final issue for the trier to pass upon his own implicated rights or interest, the rule attaches and unseats him. Subtle
…
… The court ought not to be astute to discover refined subtle distinctions to save a case from the operation of the maxim, when the principle it embodies bespeaks the propriety of its application. The immediate rights of the litigants are not the only object of the rule. A sound public policy, which is interested in preserving every tribunal appointed by law from discredit, imperiously demands its observance. “10

Exactly what are the: implicated rights or interests”10 which will disqualify a judge? As was held in Stockton, supra, the can be found in the “elements and substance of the controversy:” what the Supreme Court almost a century later referred to as the “circumstances and relationships” of a case when it decided Glass v State Highway Commission, 23 citing the U.S. Supreme Court in Murchison. 2:

“A fair trial is fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process. Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. To this end no man can be a judge in his own case and no man is permitted to try cases where he has an interest in the outcome. That interest cannot be defined with precision. Circumstances and relationship must be considered. This court has said, however, that every procedure which would offer a possible temptation to the average man as a judge…not to hold the balance site, clear and true between the state and the accused, denies the latter due process of law, ’23 Such a stringent rule may sometimes bar trial by judges who have no actual bias and who would do their very best to weigh the scales of justice equally between contending parties. But to perform it high function in the best way justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.” 24

The Glass court said, “Such reasoning applies equally to Michigan’s assurance of due process.” Therefore, virtually any “circumstances or relationship existing between a judge and a party litigant which would offer “ possible temptation to an average” person “ not to hold the balance nice, clear and true” between contending litigants denies due process of law and is interest enough to provide grounds for disqualification.
”23”
We expect our judges to be human beings with normal human faults and shortcomings like the rest of us, not angles in robes. We realize there are some situations where it would be extremely difficult for any judge to remain neutral and impartial, the often-quoted opinion in Wayne County Prosecutor v. Doerfler 24

“Justice Cardozo has stated.

“ Deep below consciousness are other forces, the likes and dislikes, the predilections and the prejudices, the complex of instincts and emotions and habits and convictions which make the man, be he litigant or judge. “27

A judge is not expected to bring with him to the bench a blank mind and personality. As he becomes, by necessity, a composition of the general experiences of his life, refined and honed by his legal training and legal experience so that the desired judicial temperament will hopefully emerge. “28

To require a blank mind is unreasonable, but to demand an impartial and clear appraisal of each new case is not. A judge may well be subconsciously prejudiced in one way towards the evidence or the parties in a case before him. It is his duty not to permit these prejudices to override his responsibilities in providing a fair forum for the determination of controversy. This duty should ideally motivate the judge to request reassignment of the case if he is aware of any prejudices which he holds which would interfere with his impartiality “29

Modern disqualification rules, grounded in public policy, exist as much for the good of the court as for the good of any litigant; and every judge has a duty to avoid even the appearance of bias, prejudice or partiality. Freely granting disqualification when justified and necessary to achieve that end. As was said in Warren Schools v. MERC: 2

“The object of this rule…is more than guaranties that a legal dispute will be resolved objectively by unbiased and impartial persons. It is also a shield against any suspicion on the part of the litigants and the public that any subjectivity, bias and partiality contributed to the outcome of the dispute. The though behind such was best expressed by Justice Frankfurther in Baker v Carr 22:

The Court’s authority – possessed of neither the purse nor the sword – ultimately rests on sustained pubic confidence in its moral sanction. Such feeling must be nourished by the Court’s complete detachment, in fact and in appearance…” 22

The Michigan Supreme Court has adopted a rule stated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Withrow:”4 judges and decision-makers should be disqualified without a showing of actual bias where “experience teaches that probability of actual bias on the part of the judge or decision-maker is too high to be constitutionally tolerable, “4

Throughout the last century. Courts have slowly but surely broadened the measure by which a disqualification “threshold” can be reached, steadily relaxing the standards for it employment. While early decisions tended more toward requiring concrete evidence of bias such as direct financial or personal interest, there was a gradual movement toward requiring only an appearance of bias, now well-established; and, more recently, the trend is allowing a petitioner’s reasonable belief that bias exists to establish the appearance of bias, to wit:
In a 1981 decision, Pitoniak v Borman’s, 5 the court held:

“A basic requirement of the constitutional right is due process is a hearing before a fair, unbiased and impartial decision-maker. 1/2/3/4/5 A party who challenges the impartiality of a judge need not show actual prejudice; it is one in which: experience teaches that the probability of actual bias on the part of the judge or decision-maker is too high to be constitutionally tolerable. “4/5/6

Then in 1982, the Michigan Court of Appeals held, in People v Lowenstein: 14

“… (Some disqualification cases)… deal with how much of an allowance our courts will make for a judge’s inherent human failings. No human being (even a judge) is completely prejudice-free. But our judicial system requires judges. Therefore we make allowances. Under normal circumstances, we will assume (absent evidence to the contrary) that the judge is free enough from bias to make a tolerably non-partisan decision. For example, a judge will occasionally preside over a case involving a defendant who had earlier pleaded guilty to the offense. Because this situation often enough arises and because the appearance of impropriety is not that high, we allow the trial judge to remain in charge of the case absent a showing of actual bias…A C However, we realize that some situations are just too dangerous. Judges normally are not subjected to such special pressures and “under a realistic appraisal of psychological tendencies in human weaknesses, we find that the appearance of justice requires the judge to disqualify himself. The test is not (just) whether or not actual bias or an appearance of bias that the judge was unable to hold the balance between vindicating the interests of the court and the interests of the accused. “17 In fact, even though a judge personally believes himself to be unprejudiced, unbiased and impartial, he should nevertheless certify disqualification where there are circumstances of such a nature to cause doubt as to his partiality, bias or prejudice. “18/6/2 (emphasis added)

And circumstances of such a nature as to cause doubt can arise from the mind of a petitioner, as was held in1986 by the Florida Supreme Court, which arrived at the Michigan result by applying the same analysis from a different perspective, making several important points along the way as emphasized below:

“ … The facts alleged in a motion to disqualify need only show that the party making it has a well-grounded fear that be or she will not receive a fair trial at the hands of the judge. Judicial inquiry should focus on the reasonableness of the affiant’s belief that the judge. Judicial inquiry should focus on the reasonableness of the affiant’s belief that the judge may be biased, and not the judge’s own perception of his or her ability to act fairly. … The sufficiency of the allegations depends upon whether he or she has successfully established the actual existence of prejudice. The letter standard would render the motion for disqualification virtually futile and result in the sort of adversary proceeding between judge and petitioner that create bias or the appearance thereof even where none had existed before. “33 (emphasis added)

And further to that:

“Generally, disqualification of a judge from action in a proceeding in which he is not wholly free, disinterested and independent is intended not merely for the benefit of the parties to the suit, who are entitled to the cold neutrality of an impartial judge, but for the general interests of justice, by preserving the purity and impartiality of the courts, and the respect and confidence of the people for their decisions. Moreover, judicial tribunals must not only be, but appear to be impartial, so that where circumstances are such as to create in the mind of a reasonable man a suspicion of bias, disqualification may be warranted although there is no proof of actual bias. “36 (emphasis added)

No matter where the evolution of disqualification theory may lead, the eternal catch -22 of disqualification law will always follow: upon any request for disqualification, if there exists even a reasonable suspicion of the presence of bias, prejudice or partiality any failure to grant the request tends to beg the question, lead to more suspicion and possibly create the evil otherwise truthfully denied and sought is be avoided.

A truly independent non-biased judge considering such a situation should not care about retaining jurisdiction of any particular case; but instead rise above one’s self, respect a petitioner’s well-plead request and promptly proceed to remove all grounds for any suspicion of doubt, by granting disqualification.


Procedure:

Proper procedure for handling a motion to disqualify is well established and was recently summarized in Czuprynski v Bay 1 2 follows:

“The procedure for disqualification of a trial judge . . . which was formerly provided by statute is now provided by court rule. MCR 2.003 generally, that procedure is exclusive and must be followed. “10/31.

: MCR 2.003 provides that a party or attorney seeking disqualification must file a written motion supported by an affidavit of facts and including all know grounds for disqualification. The Judge complained of then holds a holds a hearing and decides the motion. If the motion is denied, then the party or attorney may refer the motion to the chief judge who must decide the motion de novo on the record 32/33


Respectfully submitted this October 17, 2006



By ______________________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O.Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679


TABLE OF CITATIONS AND AUTHORITIES
1. US Const, Am XIV; Mich Const 1963,art 1,set 17;
2. In Re Murchison, 349 US 133, 136; 75 S Ct 623( 1955)
3. Gibson v Berryhill, 411 US 564, 579; 93 S Ct 1689 ( 1973)
4. Crampton v Dep’t of State, 395 Mich 347, 351 ( 1975 )
5. Pitoniak v Borman’s, Inc. 104 Mich App 718, 722-723(1981)
6. Withrow v Larkin, 421, US 35, 47; 95 S Ct 1455( 1975)
7. Mathews v Eldridge,424, US 319, 335; 96 S Ct 893 ( 1976 )
8. Goldberg v Kelly, 397 US 254, 263-271; 90 S Ct 1011 ( 1970)
9. Wayne Circuit Judges v Wayne County, 386 Mich 1 ( 1971)
10. Stockwell v Township Board, 22 Mich 341 ( 1871)
11. Peninsular Railway Co. v. Howard, 20 Mich 18 ( 1870 )
12. People v Houston, 179 Mich app 753, 756 ( 1983 )
13. Clemens v Bruce, 122 Mich App 35, 37-38 ( 1982 )
14. People v Lowenstein, 118 Mich App 475, 481-432 ( 1982 )
15. United State v Grinnell, 384 US 563; 86 S C: 1698 ( 1966 )
16. People v Rider, 93 Mich App 383 ( 1979 )
17. Ungar v Sarafite. 376 US 573, 588: 84 S Ct 841 ( 1964 )
18. Merritt v Munster, 575 P2d 623, 624 ( Okla. 1978 )
19. Strong v Pontiac General. 117 Mich App 143, 148 ( 1982 )
20. Wayne County v Recorder’s Court, 81 Mich App 143, 148 ( 1982 )
21. Warren Schools v MERC. 67 Mich App 58 ( 1976 )
22. Baker v Carr. 369 US 186, 267; 82 S Ct 691. 737 – 738 ( 1962 )
23. Tumey v Ohio 273 US 510; 47 S Ct 437 ( 1927 )
24. Offutt v United States, 348 US 11, 14; 75 S Ct 11 ( 1955 )
25. Glass v State Hwy Const. 370 Mich 482 ( 1963 )
26. Wayne County Prosecutor v Doerfler, 14 Mich App 428( 1968 )
27. Cardozo, Nature of the Judicial Process, p. 167.
28. Utilities Com v Pollak, 343 US 451, 466; 72 S Ct 813 ( 1952 )
29. Mirych v State Fair Commission, 376 Mich 384( 1965 )
30. Consumer Power v Iosco Circuit Judge, 210Mich 572 ( 1920 )
31. Hayes-Albion v Kuberski, 108Mich App 642, 657-658 ( 1981 )
32. Gruprynski v Bay Judge, 166 Mich 118, 123-124 (1988)
33. People v Gauntlett, 134 Mich 737, 757-761 ( 1984 )
34. MCR 2.003 et seq.
35. Caleffe v Vitale,65 ALR 4th 67, 71-72 ( 1986 )
36. See 46 Am Jur 2d, Judges ss. 86; see also ss. C ( 1 ) ( a. b ) of Canon 3 of the Code 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct ( Am Jur 2d Desk book )

STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE 44th JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT OF (LIVINGSTON COUNTY)
210 S. HIGHLANDER WAY, HOWELL, MICHIGAN, 48843 (517-546-9816)

GEORGE EDWARD LYONS HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY LATEILLE
P.O.BOX 226 Case no. 06-021758-CZ
PINCKNEY, MICHIGAN 48169
734-424-9335
PLAINTIFF
-V-
RONALD STORZBACH AND VIRGINIA STORZBACH H/W
7709 PARTRIDGE HILL,
Brighton, Michigan 48116
Moved to: 912 Sandwedge Court
Bowling Green,KY 42103-2508
UNKNOWN
DEFENDANTS

Richard Friberg and Ann Friberg H/W
5640 Shoshoni Pass
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
540-823-3271
Moved to: 19385 Briar Patch Drive
Gordonville, Va. 22942-7564
DEFENDANTS

David Feeback and Carrie Feeback H/W
10932 Whitewood
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-878-1068 DEFENDANTS

Curt Lalonde and Mary Ann Lalonde H/W
3100 Crystal Springs Lane aka 3100 Betty Lyons Lane
Pinckney, Hamburg Township, Michigan 48189
734-878-2286 DEFENDANTS
734-878-2287

(REVISED)
Past cases filed against Plaintiff and the continues Biasness against Plaintiff George Lyons in the Livingston County Court System.

Your Honor Please review Exhibits A-1 and Exhibits A-2 prior in exhibits. In case file.

Footnote: all Disqualification of Judge’s was structured if motion is denied proves that the Judge’s are Bias.

On STORZBACH AND FRIBERG’S vs. Lyons Builders, Inc. 04-020684-CK

ISSUE: Judge Stanley Latreille: Motion for Disqualification: denied request. The court had full knowledge of the wrongful actions of Storzbach and Friberg.
1. Storzbach, Friberg v. Lyons Builders, Inc. Plaintiff George Lyons can and did prove their criminal actions. Audiotapes on all attorneys’ and their illegal court actions.

( 1998 The State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Service closed the false complaint of Richard and Ann Friberg and founded that Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Lyons did no violations against Friberg’s).

2. ISSUE: Storzbach attorney Richard Conlin, made a false statement to the court to acquire a $55,000.00 levy and a $ 3,000.00 legal fees, By falsely stating he personally mail out notice of hearing to George Lyons, Through audio tape conversations Richard Conlin, was to mail all notices to George Lyons Attorney this was not done, attorney Richard Conlin stated in court that he had no idea that George Lyons was being represented by an attorney. This statement was false an misleading. By this statement of Attorney Richard Conlin illegally acquire Storzbach a false levy OF $55,000.00 and $3,000.00 attorney fees. And these actions of Storzbach and Friberg started the Ripple effect of Fraud ON STORBACH’S AND THEIR ATTORNEY RICHARD COLIN PART. SEE AUDIO TAPES.

Footnote: FIVE FALSE LAW SUITS WERE FILED AGAINST PLAINTIFF GEORGE LYONS, BY STORZBACH, FRIBERG, LALONDE, MARCICH, STEEBER. All building contracts of George Lyons and Lyons Builder’s Inc. Were governed by the American Arbitration clause, The Livingston County Court system had no jurisdiction in any of these Case. Motion was presented by George Lyons and all motions were denied by all Judges’. NONE OF THESE BUILDING CONTRACT’S WAS TO BE IN THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY COURTS SYSTEM FOR NO JURISDICTION.

1. ISSUE: Attorney Brian Lavan represented George Lyons and his company Lyons & Associates, Inc. On two different court cases. Brian Lavan then represented George Lyons and his company with a lease with option to buy 210 S. East St. Brighton Mi. Between and signed by Brian & Karen Lavan.

2. ISSUE: Attorney Brian Lavan then without George Lyons permission then represented Patricia A. Lyons ex-wife of George Lyons. In to acquire illegally acquire lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision, 5456 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. Which Attorney Brian Lavan committed Conflict of Interest against George Lyons and his companies.

3. ISSUE: Plaintiff requested motion before Judge Laterille to remove Brian Lavan for Conflict of Interest. Motion denied by Judge Stanley Laterille. Then a Motion to disqualify Judge Laterille for Biasness, Motion denied by Judge Stanley Laterille. See Michigan Court rules on Disqualification of Judge’s

4. ISSUE: Court receiver Dale Cooper who was the Court Receiver for filing false statements to Judge Stanley Laetrile review exhibit and audio tape on Del Cooper and Attorney Grievance complaint that was presented in to Court.

5. ISSUE: The evidence given to this court proven beyond a reasonable doubt that George Lyons preformed $98,000.00+ for Storzbach but the false statement from Consumer & Industry services took president.

6. ISSUE: The evidence for Richard and Ann Friberg given to this court proven beyond a reasonable doubt that George Lyons paid out of his own pocket $ 133,000.00 toward finishing Friberg’s 5456 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan and Friberg’s owed George Lyons
$ 160,000.00 at time of closing.

7. ISSUE: Court receiver Dale Cooper court receiver for Storzbach and Friberg fraudulent case, filed false report to Judge Stanley Laterille. Review exhibits and audio tape of Dale Cooper review Attorney Grievance on Dale Cooper. Attorney Dale Cooper caused legal interference and illegal actions caused these illegal actions of tortuous Interference, civil conspiracy, restriction of trade and fraud. Both cases of Storzbach and Friberg were Fibrous laws committed by these people and their attorney’s.

8. ISSUE: This evidence was given to this court proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Plaintiff George Lyons preformed $ 98,000.00+ more work for Storzbach but the False statement from Consumer & Industry service took president, See audio tapes on Consumer & Industry Service and their wrongful filing of false complaint reports.

9. ISSUE: The evidence for Richard and Ann Friberg given to this court proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant at the time George Lyons paid out of his own pocket

$ 133,000.00 toward finishing Friberg’s 5456 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan. THE FRIBERG’S WERE TRANSFER TO GORDONVILLE, VIRGINIA HALF WAY THROUGH CONSTRUCTION OF 5654 SHOSHONI PASS, PINCKNEY, MICHIGAN.

PLAINTIFF GEORGE LYONS HAD TO BORROW MONEY TO FINISH CONSTRUCTION. USING $ 90,000.00 OF PLAINTIFF GEORGE LYONS HIS PRIVATE HOME 1194 CAMELOT, PINCKNEY, MI. AS COLLATERAL. THE FRIBERG’S OWE PLAINTIFF $ 160,000.00 AT THE TIME OF CLOSING PLUS MONEY TO SUBCONTRACTOR AND MATERIAL HANDLERS AT THE TIME OF CLOSING.

10. ISSUE: COURT RECIEVER DALE COOPER INTERFERANCE AND ILLEGAL ACTIONS CAUSED THESE ILLEGAL ACTIONS OF TORTOUS INTERFERENCE, CIVIL CONSPIRACY, RESTRICTION OF TRADE AND FRAUD, AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

BIG ISSUE:

ISSUE: Livingston County Case People of the State of Michigan against George Lyons for ENTERING WITHOUT PERMISSION 99-1823-SM.

Footnote: George Lyons has evidence that Prosecutor Attorney had full Knowledge that Kopp’s made a fraudulent filing a false forfeiture against George Lyons. The Prosecutor’s did the following stating that George Lyons was could not commutate with his Attorney, and the case was dismissed.

1. Plaintiff George Lyons borrowed $ 90,000.00 from the Kopp’s to finish 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan.

2. Kopp’s filed a wrongful lawsuit of forfeiture against the Plaintiff George Lyons stating the never received and payments toward the $ 90,000.00 that Plaintiff borrowed from the Kopp’s.

3. Plaintiff George Lyons was wrongful remove from marital residence 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. by ex-wife Patricia Ann Lyons. She was informed by her attorney Brian Lavan to remove Plaintiff George Lyons from 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan. This illegal action or removal from residence 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. Plaintiff was banded from 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. This held all evidence that proved Kopp’s made a fraudulent forfeiture lawsuit against the Plaintiff.

4. In July 2004 Plaintiff George Lyons received evidence that was at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi.

5. A certified check made out to Lyons Builders, Inc. dated 1994 for $ 24,000.00 that stated paid to the order of Karl and Marian Kopp, for the Payment on Camelot. Footnote: this was an agreed contract the certified check showed contract was for payment on Camelot.

FOOTNOTE: Plaintiff George Lyons has evidence that Prosecutor Attorney had full knowledge that Kopp’s made a fraudulent filing a false forfeiture against Plaintiff George Lyons.

ISSUE: Kopp’s filed a false police report against the Plaintiff George Lyons for entering without permission in 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan.
ISSUE: To Stop the Plaintiff George Lyons.

The Livingston County court motion that Plaintiff George Lyons should go under a mental examination test. This motion was presented by the Livingston County Prosecutor’s office. This wrongful action stopped the Plaintiff from having due process.

ISSUE: Footnote: Prosecutor’s office had in its possession transcripts that the Kopp’s made the fraudulent police report showing that Kopp’s gave permission the Plaintiff George Lyons. See Audio tapes.

ISSUE: The Prosecutor’s did the following from the report from the Forensic Ypsilanti, Mi. could not communicate with his court appointed Attorney Mark Spickard, and the case was dismissed. See Attorney Grievance against Attorney Mark Spickard and Forensic Dr. Judith Thompson.

ISSUE: Judge Delvero: Motion for Disqualification: Gave overwhelming evidence to Judge Delvero that George Lyons was innocent the evidence given to Judge Delvero court will prove this. See Case File.

ISSUE: False police report of Kopp’s for entering without permission: Transcripts were given to Livingston County Prosecutor’s proving that George Lyons was given permission to enter 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan. See Case File.
ISSUE: This wrongful action by the Kopp’s for entering without permission: Transcripts were given to Livingston County Prosecutors proving that Plaintiff George Lyons was given permission to enter 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan by the Kopp’s please review case file.

ISSUE: This wrongful action by the Kopp’s in making a false police report against Plaintiff George Lyons for entering 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. Plaintiff Home. These illegal actions were a cover-up for the Kopp’s making a Fraudulent Forfeiture against Plaintiff residence at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi.

1. ISSUE: George Lyons played audiotapes for court appointed attorney Mark Spickard, and taped recorded Spickard listening and recorded his comments of the Kopp’s giving Permission to enter 1194 Camelot, Pinckney.

2. ISSUE: Judge Delvero ordered George Lyons to have a forensic test in Ypsilanti, Michigan. Played audio taped to Ypsilanti Forensic examiner Judith Thompson and George Lyons then audio taped examiner Judith Thompson and recorded her comments.

3. ISSUE: COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY SPICKARD AND FORENSIC EXAMINER JUDITH THOMPSON HAD TO DO WAS STATE TO THE COURT, GEORGE LYONS WAS GIVEN PERMISSION TO ENTER 1194 CAMELOT, PINCKNEY, MI. AND THE CASE WOULD HAVE NOT BEEN DROPPED.

4. ISSUE: BUT TO PROTECT OTHER ATTORNEY’S AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, THEY HELD BACK EVIDENCE. This was a cover-up and obstruction of Justice, and Judicial misconduct. This gave the Kopp’s illegal possession of 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi market price $ 800,000.00 to $ 1,100,000.00 . This was illegally supported by Livingston County Court system and the Livingston County Prosecutor’s office.

5. ISSUE: These actions will place Court appointed attorney Mark Spickard and Livingston County Prosecutor’s and Forensic examiner Judith Thompson into malpractice actions, and illegal interference and civil conspiracy and restriction of trade, and Fraud, Judicial misconduct and obstruction of Justice.

6. ISSUE: George Lyons loses his builders and residential brokers license in June 2000 because of the false complaints of the past clients, which has a 6 year statue of limitations against the above clients, and attorney’s and examiner for the state of Michigan.

7. ISSUE: These wrongful actions will place Court appointed attorney Mark Spickard and Livingston County Prosecutor’s and Forensic examiner Judith Thompson into malpractice illegal actions, and illegal interference and civil conspiracy and restriction of trade and Fraud, Judicial misconduct and obstruction of Justice.

8. ISSUE: The wrongful Livingston County Prosecutor’s and Livingston County Court system, and the Friend of the Court used false mental examinations to wrongfully control the Plaintiff George Lyons ( See attorney Grievance letter for the FRIEND OF THE COURT REFEREE GERALD EDIT.) ENCLOSED.

9. ISSUE: Plaintiff George Lyons wrongful loses his builders license and residential brokers license in June 2000 which has a 6 year statue of Limitations against the above clients, and attorney’s and examiner for the State of Michigan.

10. The following illegal actions of Storzbach, Friberg, Feeback, Lalonde, Marcich through the Livingston County Building Department and their inspector proves that Plaintiff George Lyons of Lyons Builders, Inc. performed over $ 387,000.00 of work that these past clients and never paid for. And these Clients caused Plaintiff George Lyons to face false Charges of N.S.F.

Charges which falls under criminal actions. See evidence given to Court . All Plaintiff evidence were hid away from Plaintiff by Ex-wife Patricia A. Lyons and Karl and Marian Kopp because they were afraid they may lose the equity of $ 800,000.00 to $ 1,100,000.00 and the $ 65,000.00 balance owed to the Kopp’s this was directed by Attorney Brian Lavan of Patricia Ann Lyons. See audio tape and Attorney Grievance Committee of Brian Lavan.

Lalonde, Marcich framed Plaintiff for false N.S.F. Charges

ISSUE: People of the State of Michigan N.S.F. CHARGES 96-9526-FH /96-9522-FH /96-9523-FH See Case Files these files are open to the Public.

1. ISSUE: Judge Daniel Burress-False N.S.F. Charges filed against Plaintiff please review Chain of events. Statements in transcripts in court case, session of large groups that was truly stated in court was not included in the transcripts. See audio tapes of Plaintiff recorded in court by the Plaintiff.

2. ISSUE: Prior to this Judge Daniel Burress had three motions for disqualification for biasness, Once for refusal of removing Brian Lavan on conflict of Interest, as attorney for representing ex-wife in divorce between George Lyons and Patricia Lyons, and second for Motions for Attorney Charles Wedmaier conflict of interest, Mr. Wedmaier represented George Lyons and Lyons & Associates, Inc. (aka Lyons Builders, Inc. in the case against Brian Lavan, illegally removing George Lyons from 210 S. East Street, Brighton, Mi.

SO ATTORNEY BRIAN LAVAN COULD ILLEGAL REMOVE PLAINTIFF GEORGE LYONS AND TAKE POSSESSION OF 210 S. EAST ST. BRIGHTON, MI. TO ACQUIRE A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MORE PROFITABLE FOR ATTORNEY BRIAN LAVAN ON GRAND RIVER, BRIGHTON, MICHIGAN. SEE AUDIO TAPE AND THESE GAVE MOTIVE FOR BRIAN LAVAN ILLEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF GEORGE LYONS.

1. ISSUE: Charles Wedmaier without permission from George Lyons represents past client Curt & Mary Ann Lalonde and Ivo & Heather Marcich. These actions of company Harris & Literski and attorney Charles Widmaier, proves beyond a reasonable doubt a conflict of Interest and tortuous interference, civil conspiracy, restriction of trade, and fraud. George Lyons request espungment from the false N.S.F. charges, review all evidence prior to hearing of the N.S.F. charges and after the false N.S.F. charges proves overwhelming that George Lyons and his company was falsely charged for N.S.F. charges. BECAUSE THE PAST CLIENTS CURT AND MARY ANN LALONDE, AND IVO AND HEATHER MARCICH FRAMING PLAINTIFF GEORGE LYONS FOR THE FALSE N.S.F. CHARGES. SEE AUDIO TAPES AND PERMIT HISTORY OF THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT, OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

Footnote: Through the Livingston County Building Department proves that these clients, Storzbach, Friberg, Lalonde, Feeback, and Lalonde owed this writer $ 387,000.00 this is support by the Livingston County Building inspector on audio tapes.

2. ISSUE: In Court George Lyons had over 2 feet of evidence was presented to Judge Burress court and the Livingston County Prosecuting attorney.

3. ISSUE: 6 time with the State of Police, MANY times with the Pinckney police, and FIVE TIMES with the Hamburg township police, and THREE TIMES to the F.B.I. investigators in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and NUMBEROUS TIMES WITH Livingston County Sheriff department, and to the Michigan Consumer & Industry services, Livingston County Building Department, and Washtenaw County Sheriff department, evidence was given that Past clients were framing George Lyons and his company for false N.S.F. charges.

4. All policing agencies agreed that these past clients were framing George Lyons for false N.S.F. charges, all police agents were audio taped and their upset responses about these past clients to George Lyons. That they talk to Livingston County prosecutor, and stated the Livingston County Prosecutor’s stated “even if George Lyons was telling the truth, the Livingston County prosecutor would not do anything. And refused to proceed. But still all policing agencies all agreed that these past clients were framing George Lyons for false N.S.F.

5. ISSUE: This is a cover-up of a false police report. And costing George Lyons loses of Builders, and residential broker’s licenses, and 5 years of probations for being falsely charged for N.S.F. charges.

ISSUE: Judge Delvero: Karl Kopp filed a false police report against George Lyons
a. False police report for entering without permission 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi.
b. George Lyons was falsely arrested and taken to the Livingston County Jail.
c. The above action falls under tortuous interference, civil conspiracy, false police report, fraud, restriction of trade.

1. ISSUE: Conversations between Marian Kopp and George Lyons Audio tapes these conversations giving permission to enter 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. this conversations was played for George Lyons court appointed attorney Mark Spickard all he had to do was go into court and state that George Lyons was given permission to move into 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan. But Spickard did not PRESENT THIS EVIDENCE TO THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY COURT SYSTEM SHOWING OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT BY COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY MARK SPICKARD PART.

2. ISSUE: Court orders by Judge Delvero to have a George Lyons take a Forensic exam. That Exam was done by Forensic examiner Judith Thompson, the same tape was played for Judith Thompson, and again all Mrs. Thompson had to do was tell the court Mr. Lyons was given permission to enter into 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. But her report was George Lyons was not competent to stand trial (not being able to communicate with court appointed attorney.) Again by doing this fraudulent action this stopped George Lyons from acquiring his home that was falsely taken away from him BY KARL AND MARIAN KOPP.

3. ISSUE: And also this action protected the legal representatives and attorney in stopping from any money to fight past clients, and their malpractice attorneys. Attorney that work for me before they work for past clients. AND STOPPED THE PLAINTIFF FROM ACQUIRING 1194 CAMELOT, PINCKNEY, MICHIGAN. THESE ILLEGAL ACTIONS OF THESE PEOPLE CAUSE THE FOLLOWING TO PROTECT THE KOPP’S IN

a. Making a false forfeiture on 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan.
b. For illegal acquiring equity funds for legal representation.

ISSUE: Judge Stanley Latreille: George Lyons started suit with Ivo & Heather Marcich in Ingham County Circuit court for making false complaints with the Lansing State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services to acquire illegal funds from George Lyons ad his company, Defendant’s attorney Charles Wedmaier filed a change of venue.

Friend of the court- Case No.: 1996023807 DM

ISSUE: Judge Susan Reader: Divorce case from Judge Daniel Burress to Judge Susan Reader as Friend of the court judge. Disqualification against Honorable Judge Susan Reck.

1. Overwhelming evidence was given to this Honorable court.

2. ISSUE: Request for removing Court Receiver Gerald Edit for Conflict of interest, Court Receiver Gerald Edit work for Attorney Brian Lavan and Attorney Gerald Edit represent Brian Lavan. George Lyons hired Brian Lavan to fight a lawsuit against James and Betty Steeber v. Lyons & Associates, Inc. that the Steeber’s breach building contract.

3. ISSUE: George Lyons was directed to be examined by Dr. Zipper. Overwhelming evidence was given to Dr. Zipper proving that ex-wife was using the Friend of the Court to financially destroying and keep George Lyons from his children.

a. Dr. Zipper still wrote a fraudulent letter to the Court Receiver Gerald Eidt against
George Lyons. Placing George Lyons in a bad light.

b. ISSUE: George Lyons requests another Doctor. This doctor was from the same office of Dr. Zipper.

c. ISSUE: Dr. Rockwell found that George Lyons was not true that the false allegations that Dr. Zipper stated in his report, that George Lyons is highly intelligent person, and loved his daughters very much, and that his ex-wife was using the Court of Judge Daniel Burress and the Court of Judge Susan Reck to financially destroy George Lyons and keep George Lyons from his Daughters. All these meeting were audio taped.

d. ISSUE: Court Receiver Gerald Edit did not like this letter. And requested to have Dr. Zipper again review George Lyons.

e. ISSUE: Prior to the meeting the children of George Lyons and Patricia A. Lyons were ordered by the Friend of the Court their own attorney.

f. ISSUE: This attorney received overwhelming evidence against proving George Lyons innocent of any charges made by Patricia A. Lyons. The same evidence that again was given to Doctor Zipper.

g. ISSUE: Doctor Zipper listen to audio tapes along with Patricia A. Lyons attorney Molly Reno, in a report that Court Referee Gerald Edit false statement that he talk to the eldest daughter, Jeannine A. Lyons.

h. ISSUE: In Gerald Edit statement that his daughter in an interview with Mr. Edit stated that Her Father stated to her that their was someone out to get her, and cut off her fingers, and Kill her and her sister. Gerald Edit wrote this in a court report to Judge Susan Reck.

i. ISSUE: Finding out this outrageous story, George Lyons contacted his daughter, and audio taped this conversation. George Lyons asks his daughter, who would say such a crazy story. Jeannine A. Lyons stated that her mother (Patricia A. Lyons and Dale Fisher) stated to her that someone was out to kill her and her sister, and cut their fingers off.

j. George Lyons then asked her why they would say anything like that to them, Jeannine Lyons stated because they care about us, and you don’t. George Lyons said so I never very said anything like that. Jeannine Lyons stated no dad you never did.

k. ISSUE: This audio tape was played for Gerald Edit (prior working for Friend of the Court. Friend of the court Referee Gerald Edit work for Attorney Brian Lavan.) Now George Lyons recorded his comments, and to Dr. Zipper and his comments, and both attorney Patricia A. Lyons attorney and my daughter’s attorney and George Lyons recorded their comments.

l. ISSUE: Dr. Zipper made fraudulent statements to the Friend of the Court even after this evidence proving the innocents of George Lyons. Costing Plaintiff George Lyons $70.00 per hour in a supervised environment.

m. ISSUE: Patricia Lyons wrote a letter to the Friend of the Court, that letter was completely taken apart by George Lyons sentence by sentence; proving that everything was in that letter was fabricated by Patricia A. Lyons. (This is proven through audio tapes and documents through the freedom of information act with the Consumer & Industry Services.

n. This evidence was given to Patricia A. Lyons Attorney, and to Gerald Eidt court referee for Friend of the court, and to the Daughter s attorney, and most of all to Dr. Richard Zipper. Still after this information was given out Dr. Zipper working for Gerald Edit, made a poor court report against George Lyons.

IMPORTANT ISSUE

Footnote: Prior to working as a Friend of the Court Referee Attorney Gerald Edit work for Plaintiff George Lyons. Attorney Gerald Edit work for Attorney Brian Lavan causing conflict of interest against Plaintiff George Lyons. Plaintiff George Lyons made a motion to removal of Gerald Edit this motion was denied by Judge Susan Reck, causing biasness against plaintiff George Lyons.


o. ISSUE: This again court cover-up to protect (Attorney Brian Lavan and Bad attorneys and illegal past clients and others and possibly Judge’s that were disqualified for biasness.

BIG ISSUE

ISSUE: There is other evidence like the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services doctoring George Lyons residential Broker license.

ISSUE: And then Ann Arbor Board of Realtors finding that George Lyons was found did no violations by the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services case.

And informed by this false allegations. But the Ann Arbor board of Realtors still ruled to remove George Lyons and his company from the Ann Arbor board of Realtors for one year. That they did not get evidence from the Consumer & Industry services,

ISSUE: George Lyons audio taped Ann Arbor Board of Realtors executive secretary Lisa Kirk, receiving that information prior to any formal complaints, this was audio taped conversation by George Lyons, The audio tape was then played for Executive President Pete Cornell, and again George Lyons audio taped Mr. Cornell acknowledgement and his comments to the tape recording. Still George Lyons was removed from the Ann Arbor Board of Realtors for 1 year even despite the fact that he was found innocents by The Consumer & Industry Services and false allegations were made by past clients. The above is just a very small part of evidence against the above.

ISSUE: PLAINTIFF IS REQUESTING THE STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL TENURE TO INVESTIGATE THIS HONORABLE COURT TO INQUIDE THE FOLLOWING FILES AS EVIDENCE FROM THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.

Plaintiff requests the following cases to be used files and transcript and court video and audio recording to be used as evidence in Case 04-020652. Lyons v. kopp.

1. People of the State of Michigan N.S.F. CHARGES 96-9526-FH /96-9522-FH /96-9523-FH
2. People of the State of Michigan ENTERING WITHOUT PERMISSION 99-1823-SM
3. People of the State of Michigan DOMICTIC ABUSE CHARGES 98-0467-SM

4. People of the State of Michigan STORZBACH AND FRIBERG’S 04-020684-CK
5. Friend of the court- Case No.: 1996023807 DM


These figures do not include Plaintiff lose in income or payments still owed to the Plaintiff over the many years. That total is over $ 800,000.00 to $ 14,000,000.00 chain of events for total.


CONCLUSION
The Plaintiff hopes and prays this Honorable court grant the Plaintiff constitutional right: In a 1981 decision, Pitoniak v Borman’s, 5 the court held:
“A basic requirement of the constitutional right is due process is a hearing before a fair, unbiased and impartial decision-maker. 1/2/3/4/5 A party who challenges the impartiality of a judge need not show actual prejudice; it is one in which: experience teaches that the probability of actual bias on the part of the judge or decision-maker is too high to be constitutionally tolerable. “4/5/6

ISSUE: Plaintiff has given overwhelming evidence to the Mediation and they approved this case Kopp v. Lyons to go to Court. And the Summary Disposition was again a way to stop Plaintiff from a his constitution rights, and protect past clients, the legal representatives of the Livingston County Court system, and the past Defendant’s Karl and Marian Kopp. The above people could possibly be charged for Tortuous Interference, Civil Conspiracy, Fraud, and restriction of trade.

The Plaintiff hopes and prays the following chooses. That this motion for a Stay and Judge Stanley Laterille is disqualified as judge in case Lyons v. Feeback’s and Summary disposition is set aside. And this case is transferred to The State of Michigan Administration office for a de nova hearing per law.

ISSUE: If the motion is denied it must go on record of the denial, And the following Plaintiff will pursue Judge David Reader be disqualified as judge in this case Lyons v. Feeback’s and Summary disposition is set aside. And this case is transferred to The State of Michigan Administration office for a de nova hearing per law.

ISSUE: The above Judge’s and all evidence given to Judicial Tenure, State of Michigan Bar Association, and continue the complaints with the Attorney Grievance committee.
ISSUE: The plaintiff feels if he could only present this evidence to an un-bias court or un-bias jury, the Defendant’s and others would be charged and found guilty for tortuous interference, civil conspiracy, fraud, obstruction of justice, and restriction of trade that was committed against the Plaintiff and more.

This and other evidence has be sent to the State of Michigan Judicial Tenure and Plaintiff request a Stay in this court on these Defendant’s and this case until proper review against the Livingston County Court system and their wrongful bias actions against the Plaintiff.

Respectfully submitted,



_____________________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O.Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679


Plaintiff Exhibits:

Attorney Grievance Letters. On wrongful actions on these attorney’s

State of Michigan
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF AN ATTORNEY:


ATTORNEY NAME: JOHN A. VALENTI – (P 28546)
Michigan Department of Consumer & Industry Service
PO Box 1395 FOOTNOTE: PLEASE NOTICE ATTORNEY JOHN A. VALENTI ADDRESS-BRIGHTON MI.
517-241-9424

CASE NO: ALL FALSE COMPLAINTS MADE BY THE FOLLOWING: STORZBACH, FRIBERG, LALONDE, MARCICH.

To Whom It May Concern:

Evidence that was stamped and dated is available upon request.

1. Evidence on the following cases of past clients prior to any judgments, was given to Attorney John A. Valenti, this overwhelming evidence to Consumer & Industry services, this evidence was never reviewed or was not presented or was it, or was just put on his desk and never look at.

2. Audio tape on Director James Montgomery and prior to any court date or reviews, Director James Montgomery was audiotape, Statement to George Lyons do not bring in any more evidence. These actions, caused George Lyons loses of his Builders License and his Real Estate license of 25+ years. The same licenses that had NO COMPLAINTS, UNTIL THE STORZBACHS CAME ALONG. SEE OTHER LETTERS, It is this writer thought that there has been collusion, and obstruction of justice.

3 George Lyons has overwhelming evidence that was present to Consumer & Industry services stamped and dated before any judgments or orders. That Consumer & Industry Services levied approx. $ 65,000.00 fines, George Lyons has re-peatively proved to the Consumer & Industry service material that proved beyond a reasonable doubt that George Lyons performs no violations against any clients.

4. Just one example in a case before Judge Goldstein evidence was not given to Judge Goldstein a application for real estate broker, and through the freedom of information act reviewing that application, George Lyons was innocent of the charges made by Judge Goldstein, or Attorney John A. Valenti, But George Lyons was found guilty, this action of these people was obstruction of Justice, or possible collusion with the Livingston County Prosecutor. Audiotapes and documents are available upon request.

5. George Lyons request that the Investigating team on this case should either request the any and all documents that were presented to Consumer & Industry services that is time stamped and dated. If Consumer & Industry service refuses, George Lyons has over 59 bank boxes that were presented to the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services, and these items of evidence are TIME STAMPED AND DATED by C&I SERVICE RECEIVING THESE ITEMS OF EVIDENCE.


These cases include false complaints from the Following:

a. Ronald and Virginia Storzbach
b. Richard and Ann Friberg were found that George Lyons and Lyons Builders did no violations (SEE LETTER FROM C&I SERVICES THAT LYONS BUILDERS, INC. DID NO VIOLATIONS.)
c. Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde
d. Ivo and Heather Marcich the Marcich’s cancel their complaint but State of Michigan Consumer &Industry service proceeded but the Consumer and Industry service continued In Marcich’s closed case. In Marcich’s just making the false allegation the damage was already done. In Marcich’s just making the false allegations caused major problems for Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Lyons individually.

6. Total worked with the above and David and Carrie Feeback performed by Lyons Builders, Inc. is $387,000.00+ over and above what these clients paid Lyons Builders, Inc. False fines and false letters were sent to the Livingston County Court system.

7. That these past clients used fraudulent complaints against Lyons Builders, Inc. and Lyons Inc. and George Lyons.

8. George Lyons even gave Consumer & Industry services transcripts on the above people, as stated by other investigators, that George Lyons showed evidence. A 5 year old could see that these people were lying.

9. “Also as played for Director of enforcement Andrew Millburn and Head Director Andy Metcalf and recorded there reaction, for Inspector James Burroughs of Livingston county building department. “These people were out to destroy you, and the first was Ronald Storzbach and the Steebers.” And they were ganging up on you.”

10. The bottom-line is the evidence that was given to the State of Michigan Consumer and Industry Service that was stamped and dated and audiotape conversations of C&I services employees. This writer believes this has happen to other people, and this writer has evidence to prove this.




Respectfully submitted

___________________________
George E. Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679


State of Michigan
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF AN ATTORNEYS:

ATTORNEY NAME: RICHARD E. CONLIN (P 25354)
Was with Colin, Colin, and Philbrick
Now Chief Judge
14A District Court
122 S. Main St.
Chelsea, Michigan 48118
734-475-8606

CASE NO: 94-12621 CK HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY J. LATERILLE

To Whom It May Concern:

ATTORNEY RICHARD CONLIN Committed perjury by stating that George Lyons committed Fraud, to enter a law suit into the Livingston County Courts. All building contracts were under the American Arbitration Clause:

1. Conflict of Interest: That Attorney Richard Colin of Colin, Conlin, and Philbrick represented Lyons and Associates, Inc. and George Lyons prior to representing Ronald and Virginia Storzbach.

A Conflict of Interest:

2. Attorney Richard Conlin represented Ronald and Virginia Storzbach against Lyons Builders, Inc. On there fraudulent breach of Contract.

3. Attorney Richard Conlin stated that he sent to Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Lyons a notice to be present in Court. This notice was never received by George Lyons or by Lyons Builders, Inc. A FRAUDULENT default judgment for $ 51, 0000.00 was sent to George Lyons and Lyons Builders, Inc. George Lyons contacted his attorney Thomas Brady of Farmington, Michigan. This kind of Notice should have been in CERTIFIED MAIL form. See court rules.

4. FOOTNOTE: LYONS BUILDERS, INC. PER LIVINGSTON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT PREFORMED $169,000.00+ WORTH OF WORK AND STORZBACH’S ONLY PAID $70,400.00 TO LYONS BUILDERS, INC. PLUS INCLUDED IN $169,000.00+ CHANGES THAT WAS NOT APPROVED BY LYONS BUILDERS, INC. AND NOT INCLUDED IN THE $169,000.00+

5. A motion by Attorney Richard Conlin was sent to the Livingston County Court of Honorable Judge Stanley J. Laterille. Neither George Lyons nor Lyons Builders, Inc. or Lyons Builders attorney Thomas Brady never received said notice from Attorney Richard Conlin to be present in court.

6. Appearance before Judge Stanley J. Laterille. Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Lyons attorney Thomas Brady stated that neither George Lyons or Lyons Builders, Inc. or Thomas Brady NEVER received this fraudulent notice from Attorney Richard E. Conlin to be present in court.

7. (“Attorney Richard E. Conlin stated that he personally mail notice to George Lyons and Lyons Builders, Inc. notice that he personally put the notice in a mail box. Attorney Richard E. Conlin stated he had no idea that George Lyons or Lyons Builders, Inc. was being represented by an attorney.”)

8. Honorable Judge Stanley Laterille stated that he believed Attorney Richard E. Conlin and that a levy will be placed on 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan for ($ 51,000.00) because of the Actions of Attorney Richard E. Conlin this was an illegal levy and that George Lyons would have to pay $ 3,000.00 to Attorney Richard E. Conlin for attorney fees. For the following reasons.

Attorney Richard E. Conlin had FULL knowledge that Lyons Builders, Inc. was represented by Thomas Brady:

9. Letter from Attorney Richard E. Conlin to Thomas Brady prior to any suit. Forcing THIS WRITER AND not per building contract with Ronald and Virginia Storzbach and Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Lyons would was forced to either sign over Lot 16 Partridge Point for $42,000.00 a property that Lyons Builders, Inc. paid $ 48,000.00 that was totally a breach of the building contract between Lyons Builders, Inc. and Ronald and Virginia Storzbach. See audio tape of Storzbach’s

10. Or as stated in the Letter of Attorney Richard E. Conlin that he put a lien on all 8 parcels that Lyons Builders, Inc. owned in Partridge Point subdivision. To protect 4 other clients that Lyons Builders, Inc. were under contract Lyons Builders, Inc regretfully sold the Storzbachs Lot 16 Partridge Point, Brighton, Michigan. See letter. This was a breach of building contract.

Attorney Richard E. Conlin had knowledge that Lyons Builders, Inc. was represented by Thomas Brady:

11. While George Lyons having dinner with Thomas Brady and after dinner. George Lyons was sitting in his car that has a hands free cell phone. Thomas Brady requested George Lyons to call Attorney Richard E. Conlin, Mr. Conlin came on the line and George Lyons introduced himself to Attorney Richard E. Conlin and that he was on a hands free cell call And he was with his Attorney Thomas Brady and that we both could hear him.

12. Attorney Thomas Brady introduces himself, and stated that any paper work from Conlin, Conlin, and Philbrick on Ronald and Virginia Storzbach would should be sent to Attorney Thomas Brady’s, Farmington office and per the conversation; Attorney Richard E. Conlin repeated back to Thomas Brady his address in Farmington, Michigan.

13. This conversation was taped recorded and time stamped, before any notice from to be present in Judge Stanley Laterille court. This proves that Attorney Richard E. Conlin had prior notice that Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Lyons was represented by an attorney.
14. Footnote: that any notice of appearance should be Certified mail. The actions of Attorney Richard E. Conlin of falsely forcing Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Lyons in illegally selling the Storzbach lot 16 Partridge Point, Brighton, Michigan for $42,000.00 should be brought forth, that George Lyons paid $48,000.00. THE ACQUIRED LOT 16 Partridge Point to just remove Lyons Builders, Inc. off the property and embezzle money from Lyons Builders, Inc. this action was not as approved signed contract.

15. That Attorney Richard E. Conlin stating before Honorable Stanley J. Laterille that he personally mail notice to George Lyons and Lyons Builders, Inc. should have been certified mail,

16. IMPORTANT And that Attorney Richard E. Conlin stating in Honorable Stanley J. Laterille court room “that he had no idea that Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Lyons was represented by an attorney, was false and misleading on Attorney Richard E. Conlin part.

17. In addition, could possibly be perjury. And cause a false cloud on the title work of 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. of $ 51,000.00 illegal levy. In addition, receive attorney fees for $ 3,000.00 was illegally acquired by his perjures statement.

18. The Defendant has in his possession that per the Livingston County Building inspection permit history, That Lyons Builders, Inc performed $ 168,000.00 worth of work on the Storzbach home

19. And the Storzbach only paid Lyons Builders, Inc. $ 70,400.00 that included lot 16 Partridge Point, Brighton, Michigan. See Building Permit History from Livingston County building department.

20. That Storzbach made false statements to the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry service, legal and Enforcement division. That Storzbach received a consent order from Lyons Builders, Inc. Through threats on George Lyons and his Family for $ 25,000.00. Judge Stanley Laterille denied the motion filed by this writer 1 day after Storzbach received a consent judgment.

21.The motion stated that Storzbach and Friberg received consent judgment through harm to this writer and his wife and his daughters was put in to remove said illegal retained by Storzbach’s and Friberg’s judgment.

22. Ronald Storzbach worked for G.M.A.C. And as a police officer for Hamburg township. See Police Report made to Hamburg Township made by George Lyons, where Ronald Storzbach threatens George Lyons with a gun at the 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi.

The officer taking the police report stated that he talks to Ronald Storzbach and he does not have a gun George Lyons as described to the Hamburg police officer.

23. But through a friend on Washtenaw county sheriff, Yes Ronald Storzbach does have a gun that George Lyons described.

24. Because George Lyons had no money for legal representation. Because of C&I services and past clients not paying their obligations, and attorney’s file fraudulent lawsuit of past clients and Kopp’s Patricia Lyons
25. An in addition that Storzbachs were going from client to client telling the fraudulent statements. In addition, because of these statements, the building contracts with other clients were being canceled, and the money was returned.

26. See audiotapes between Subcontractors, that Storzbachs and Jerry Jarvis the developer of Partridge point, were asking a Subcontractor to make false statements to State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services so George Lyons and Lyons Builders, Inc. would lose this writers his builder’s license.

27. This tape recording was played for State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Service auditor Nicolas Meyers and George Lyons taped recorded Nicolas Meyers listening and comments made by auditor Nicolas Meyers, on tape recording. See audiotape. Original and Meyers’s reviewing audio tape.

28. In the same Court procedures, Honorable Stanley J. Laterille combined Ronald and Virginia Storzbach with Richard and Ann Friberg’s building contract on 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney the same property that Storzbach receive fraudulent funds of $ 25,000.00.

29, that under a complaint from the Friberg’s to the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services that neither George Lyons nor Lyons Builders, Inc. DID NO VIOLATIONS AND THE CASE WAS CLOSED.

30. George Lyons has in his possession an audiotape that Friberg’s made a false complaint to the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services, and that they were transferred to Gordonville, Virginia. See letter to Consumer & Industry service.

31. Friberg’s stated on audio tape that all they wanted was the $ 140,000.00 they put into 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. And they made a false lawsuit through Attorney David Bittner (P 44948). See Audio Tapes.

32. And that through audiotapes Attorney David Bittner, had full knowledge that the Friberg’s were making false statements and these conversation are on audiotape between George Lyons and Attorney David Bittner, along with signed and dated documents that was given to Attorney David Bittners office. However, Attorney David Bittner still proceeded on a false suit from the Friberg’s.

Respectfully submitted



_____________________________
George E. Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679


State of Michigan
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256
REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF ATTORNEYS:
ATTORNEY NAME: Brian Lavan (P 16449)
Brian Lavan & Associates,
Brian Lavan, (P 16449)
Moved to:
8550 West Grand River
Brighton, Mi. 48116
(810) 227-1511
Case No: 96-23807 HONORABLE JUDGE DANIEL A. BURRESS
Case No: HONORABLE JUDGE STANLEY J. LATERILLE


ATTORNEY NAME: DALE COOPER (P12200)
See Dale Cooper grievance letter
ATTORNEY NAME: GERALD EIDT (P 32670
See Gerald Eidt grievance letter

CASE NO: 94-12621 CK HONORABLE STANLEY J. LATERILLE


To Whom It May Concern:

ATTORNEY DALE COOPER committed perjury by stating that George Lyons committed Fraud, to enter a law suit into the Livingston County Courts. All building contracts were under the American Arbitration Clause:

Attorney Brian Lavan of Brian Lavan & Associates, at the time of his representation of George Edward Lyons. In addition, Lyons & Associates, Mr. Lavan firm was at 132 E. Grand River, Brighton, Mi 48116.

1. On November 1st 1991, Attorney Brian Lavan and his wife Karen Lavan Leased 210 East Street, Brighton, Mi 48116, to Lyons & Associates, Inc. ( aka Lyons Builders, Inc ) and George Edward Lyons.

2. On approx. April 1, 1993 Attorney Brian Lavan and his employee Gerald Edit represented George Lyons in a Livingston County Circuit court, case Jim and Betty Steeber vs. Lyons & Associates, and George Lyons for the Steebers, committed breach of building contract.

3. Attorney Brian Lavan held up 3 checks of George Lyons of Lyons & Associates, Inc. after George Lyons renovated the lease office at 210 East Street, Brighton, Mi. 48116 in approx. $ 8,000.00 of new carpeting, painting etc.

4. Attorney Brian Lavan called George Lyons and requested George Lyons to file a false complaint to Consumer & Industry services, against the commercial leasing agent Richard Baker of the Baker Team of Novi, Michigan. “ I know it was not your fault for the eviction, I have a property in foreclosure,

5. and your on a lease with option to by I cannot wait, Richard has a cash buyer, but I already paid Richard Baker for your commission, I do not want to pay him for this next commission. I want you to make a complaint against Baker with the License, so I do not have to pay the commission; I refused to do any illegal action, Brian Lavan then stated: and then I will contact your attorney (Thomas Brady, George Lyons attorney, and talk to him.)

6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Attorney Brian Lavan in the State of Michigan in the Circuit Court for the County of Livingston, Represented ex-wife Patricia A. Lyons and Attorney Brian Lavan filed a Complaint for Divorce April 2nd 1996, Case No. 96-23807 before Honorable Judge Burress, Brian Lavan represented Patricia Ann Lyons, in the complaint of Divorce in the complaint for Divorce, making a false statements against George Edward Lyons that See page 3. Paragraph 13 George Lyons asked Patricia A. Lyons, and audio taped.

That conversation was:

“Patti, on page 3 paragraph 13. Injunction: Making a false statement against Defendant (George Lyons) has physically abused Plaintiff in the past and because of the action now taken by Plaintiff (Patricia A. Lyons), in the filing of this divorce action, Plaintiff is justly fearful for her physical well being and is justly fearful that Defendant will assault, beat, molest or wound her unless he is restrained from doing so by order of this Court. Defendant, asked Patricia Ann Lyons why in this in the complaint of divorce, I never hit you, or strike you, in the 19 years we been together “Patricia it been 20 years”, George why is this in here, Patricia A. Lyons stated, I know you didn’t, Brian stated it was for better negotiation.”) This was audio taped conversation.

7. On 12/4/1996 Brian Lavan then represented Patricia Ann Lyons, in case Livingston County Circuit court system before Honorable Stanley Laterille against the following Storzbach, Friberg, Chelsea lumber and JIM AND BETTY STEEBER AND LYONS BUILDERS, INC. AKA (Lyons & Associates, Inc.)

8. The same Jim and Betty Steeber that Brian Lavan represented Lyons & Associates, Inc. for Breach of contract in the above paragraphs, this writer believes that Attorney Brian Lavan committed CONFLICT INTEREST.

9. Brian Lavan also representing Patricia A. Lyons to acquire illegal funds from this case in a possible embezzling of $ 10,000.00 from Lyons Builders, Inc. by Patricia A. Lyons

10. Attorney Brian Lavan had full knowledge on Lyons Builders, Inc. Lose approx. $ 160,000.00 that was due Lyons Builders, Inc. for work done on 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi, in the Friberg and Storzbach case.

11. There is a possible collusion between Court receiver Attorney Dale Cooper and Attorney Brian Lavan, in the Livingston County Court Circuit before Honorable Judge Stanley Laterille.

12. Defendant request before Judge Burress a motion to remove Brian Lavan for Conflict of Interest and all evidence was presented, Lease agreement, and the Case of: Steeber v. Lyons & Associates, Inc. that Brian Lavan represented George Lyons and Lyons & Associates, Inc etc. Prior to the Steeber’s case prior to ex-wife Patricia A. Lyons case. Motion was denied.

13. Lyons Statement:

A. Brian Lavan Lease with option to buy a commercial property at 215 S. East Street, Brighton, Michigan to George Edward Lyons and Lyons & Associates, Inc. (aka Lyons Builders, Inc.)

B. Attorney Brian Lavan was hired to represent Lyons & Associates, Inc. (aka Lyons Builders, Inc.) And George Lyons against Jim and Betty Steeber for breach of Contract.

C. Attorney Brian Lavan illegal evicts George Edward Lyons from 215 S. East Street, Brighton, Michigan. To purchase a Foreclosure commercial property on Grand River Ave. Brighton, Michigan.

D. Attorney Brian Lavan then was hired by George Edward Lyons ex-wife Patricia A. Lyons to illegal acquire illegal funds from 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan. Against George Edward Lyons and Lyons Builders, Inc. and JIM AND BETTY STEEBER THE SAME PEOPLE THAT BRIAN LAVAN, Represented in the Law suit in the Breach of Contract JIM AND BETTY STEEBER.

IMPORTANT: Attorney Brian Lavan then represented Patricia A. Lyons in a divorce against George Edward Lyons. SEE NUMBER 5: THIS IS A HUGE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. But two motion to remove Attorney Brian Lavan in representing Patricia A. Lyons for conflict of Interest. The judge denied the motion.

IMPORTANT: Friend of the Court Referee GERALD EDIT work for Attorney Brian Lavan on the CASE AGAINST (Lyons Builders, Inc.) V JIM AND BETTY STEEBER BREACH OF CONTRACT CASE, Friend of Court Referee Gerald Edit.


14. Defendant George Lyons presented a motion for Emergency Disqualification of Judge Burress for Biasness; the case was to go to the Lansing Administration office, for a De nova hearing. It was not sent to the Lansing administration office it was sent to a Judge in Jackson, Michigan. The motion was denied. This motion if denied was structured showed that Judge Daniel Burress is Bias against George Lyons.

15. I have more evidence that include Brian Lavan employee Gerald Edit now representing the Friend of the Court of Livingston County court referee.

16. George Lyons requested Referee Gerald Edit to be removed as Referee, for conflict of Interest, Before Honorable Judge Susan Reck, overwhelming evidence was given to referee, Gerald Edit, proving that there may be possible collusion, and withholding evidence, and having full knowledge of Patricia A. Lyons through audiotapes, and presented documents shown to Referee Gerald Edit’s collusion, and biasness, Referee Gerald Edit is still representing Lyons v Lyons in the Livingston County Friend of the court.


The following possible charges against attorney Brian Lavan, trying to forcing George Lyons in making a false complaint to State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services continue Conflict of Interest, and collusion. And charges for Tortuous Interference and Civil Conspiracy. AND RESTRICTION OF TRADE, AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.



Respectfully submitted




_________________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679



State of Michigan
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF AN ATTORNEY:

ATTORNEY NAME: GERALD EIDT (P 32670)
Worked for Brian Lavan and represented George Lyons
Attorney at Law and Lyons Builders, Inc. prior to representing
Patricia A. LYONS EX-WIFE OF THIS WRITER SEES EVIDENCE.

CASE NO. 98-0467-SM
Livingston County Friend of the Court
Patricia Ann Lyons
Plaintiff
V.
George Edward Lyons
Defendant
To Whom It May Concern:

Attorney Gerald Edit Committed perjury and Obstruction of Justice by stating that George Lyons committed Fraud, to ILLEGALLY SUPPORT a FRIEND OF THE COURT law suit into the Livingston County Courts. THIS ILLEGAL ACTION OF ATTORNEY GERALD EDIT CAUSED A RIPPLE EFFECT WITH THE LEGAL COURT SYSTEM THAT CAUSED RESTRICTION OF TRADE AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. And used Dr. Richard Zipper to make fraudulent reports to the Friend of The Court system against Plaintiff-Appellant George Lyons.

1. On approx. April 1, 1993 Attorney Brian Lavan and his employee Gerald Edit represented George Lyons in a Livingston County Circuit court, case Jim and Betty Steeber vs. Lyons & Associates, (aka Lyons Builders, Inc.) And George Lyons for the Steebers, committing breach of building contract.

2. I have more evidence that include Brian Lavan ex-employee Gerald Edit now represents the Friend of the Court of Livingston County court referee.

3. That George Lyons requested to remove referee Gerald Edit, for conflict of Interest, Before Honorable Judge Susan Reck, this motion was denied by Honorable Susan Reck.
4. Then a motion for Emergency for Judge Susan Reck disqualification for Biasness was presented to the Court. Judge Susan Reck would not even recognize the motion. Overwhelming evidence was given to referee, Gerald Edit, proving that there may be possible collusion, and withholding evidence, and having full knowledge of Patricia A. Lyons fraudulent statements were exposed to Mr. Gerald Edit through audiotapes, and presented documents showing George Edward Lyons total innocents from the false statement made by Patricia A. Lyons.

5. And this shows collusion, and biasness, on Referee Gerald Edit part. And is still representing Lyons v Lyons in the Livingston County Friend of the court as Referee.

6. These audiotapes and documents may be presented to Attorney Grievance committee upon request. Attorney Gerald Edit, and after presenting to Mr. Edit this overwhelming evidence proves that he is strongly bias against George Edward Lyons, and protecting his ex-employer Brian Lavan.

7. This possible collusion would be with Attorney Brian Lavan, Dr. Richard Zipper, and Honorable Judge Susan Reck, And to keep George Lyons from discrediting Patricia A. Lyons who is the key in this issue, so that George Lyons could not acquire equity from there marital home, of over $ 450,000.00 of equity. By acquiring any of this equity, George Lyons could use it for Attorneys representation that would completely show how much collusion is going on in the Livingston county court system.

8. Just reviewing the evidence that was presented to Attorney Gerald Edit and the Friend of the Court and their employee’s or representatives, by George Edward Lyons will prove this beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, this will prove George Lyons is loving and caring of a father that these above people discredited.

EXAMPLE: In the divorce case Patricia A. Lyons made a fraudulent statement in a written letter to Friend of the court Referee Gerald Edit. See attached letter and attached evidence proving word by word that Patricia A. Lyons was not telling the truth.

9. That Gerald Edit used Bias Dr. Zipper for a false evaluation. Overwhelming evidence was given to Dr. Zipper proving this allegation.

10. George Lyons requested a new evaluation this was done by another doctor and this doctor stated that their was nothing wrong with Mr. Lyons. But the doctor as stated in letter believes that Patricia Lyons was using the court to harm Mr. Lyons.

11. Mr. Edit did not like this report. And request a new evaluation. Mr. Lyons requested not to use Dr. Zipper. But Mr. Edit insisted on using Dr. Zipper. Again another bias evaluation came back from Dr. Zipper.

12. Through evidence that was given to Dr. Zipper, a show overwhelming that Dr. Zipper is totally bias against George Lyons. And the evidence also shows overwhelming that Gerald Edit was using Dr. Zipper to wrongfully punishing George Lyons.

13. George Lyons motion to remove Gerald Edit from Friend of the Court referee. First because of the connection with Attorney Brian Lavan and the LYONS v STEEBER CASE. And second because of the evidence and the relationship with bias Dr. Richard Zipper. There is more evidence that will be produce, but this writer is not willing to expose this evidence until Referee Gerald Edit is under oath.
JUST LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE AND AUDIOTAPES ALL TIME DATED AND STAMPED AND DATED ON ALL DOCUMENTS, SEE THE PAPER TRAIL. GERALD EDIT KEPT ME FROM MY DAUGHTERS. ALONG WITH MY EX-WIFE’S FALSE STATEMENTS BY THE SUPPORT OF GERALD EDIT and the possible collusion with Attorney Brian Lavan.

Respectfully submitted



______________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O. BOX 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679


State of Michigan
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATIONS OF ATTORNEYS:

ATTORNEY NAME: DALE E. COOPER (P 12200)
Cooper & Riesterer, PLC
7960 Grand River Rd. Ste 270
Brighton, Mi. 48114-7337
(810) 227-3130

210 South Highlander Way
Howell, Michigan 48843
517-546-1850

CASE NO. CASE NO: 94-12621 CK HONORABLE STANLEY LATERILLE

Friberg/Storzbach v Lyons Builders, Inc.
And George Lyons

Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision, Pinckney
Mich. 48169
5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi.


To Whom It May Concern:

Attorney Dale E. Cooper Committed Obstruction of Justice:

Attorney Dale E. Cooper Committed perjury by stating that George Lyons committed Fraud, to support his obstruction of justice actions, in reports to the Livingston County Court system. This is greatly supported by audio tapes.

1. In approx 1997, my ex-wife Patricia A. Lyons filed a complaint with the Attorney Grievance committee File no. 1781 / 97:

2. ATTORNEY DALE E. COOPER stated that he never made this statement. That Patricia A. Lyons stated in Attorney Grievance Complaint, that Mr. Cooper was going to give Mrs. Patricia A. Lyons a list because of the reduction in the price for needs of repairs in excess of $ 22,000.00, for 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan 48169.
3. This was a fabrication on Attorney Dale E. Cooper part. I have in my possession audiotape of Attorney Dale E. Cooper acknowledging that he would give Patricia A. Lyons that list of repairs in excess of $ 22,000.00

4. This writer also has an appraisal of 5654 Shoshoni Pass prior to any suit that appraised out for $300,000.00

5. I also have letters from Real Estate One in communities to Attorney Dale Cooper acknowledging that they have two other offers over $ 265,000.00 to $ 275,000.00 that Dale Cooper received prior to the offer of $ 220,000.00.

6. Dale Cooper Court Receiver for Judge Stanley Laterille represent Laterille court, but it seems that he also represented Storzbach and Friberg’s to possibly embezzle funds from George Lyons and Lyons Builders, Inc. and Lyons, Inc. Court receiver Dale Cooper forced George Edward Lyons to sign a Warranty deed, without the legal representation of an a attorney.

7. During a hearing in Lyons v. Lyons divorce proceeding, Court receiver appeared with a Warranty Deed who was invited by Patricia A. Lyons attorney Brian Lavan. For Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision, aka 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan 48169.

8. Court receiver Dale Cooper stated to Patricia A. Lyons and George Lyons. “I want you two to sign this Warranty deed on Shoshoni Pass. George Lyons stated to Patricia A. Lyons not to sign said Warranty Deed.

9. Court receiver Dale Cooper, ask George Lyons to sign side Warranty deed, George Lyons stated I would want an attorney to review this Warranty deed. “Dale Cooper stated you don’t need an attorney, and if you don’t sign this deed right now; I am going to throw your ass in jail. George Lyons again stated I would want this to be reviewed by my attorney.

10. Dale Cooper stated then your going to jail; we’ll just sit here and wait for Judge Burress. The same Judge that refused to be Disqualify for biasness, and rejected the Motion for Attorney Brian Lavan for Conflict of Interest.

11. George Lyons and Patricia A. Lyons, was threaten to sign said Warranty deed by Court Receiver Dale Cooper, George Lyons stated that I am signing this Warranty deed and stated to the notary republic, and to Dale Cooper who was present. “That I am signing this warranty deed under duress. THIS WAS TAPE-RECORDED.

12. In addition, with the figures at the beginning of these documents that Storzbach only paid Lyons Builders, Inc. $70,400.00 and through the Livingston County Building department, Lyons Builders, Inc. preformed $ 169,000.00 + and Friberg’s through the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry service, in Friberg’s complaint.

13. The Letter from the State of Michigan C & I services state the case is closed and that Lyons Builders, Inc. DID NO VIOLATION. But Storzbach and Friberg’s continue to embezzled funds form Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Lyons

14. . Now because of the illegal actions of court receiver Dale Cooper AND THE DEFENDANT(S)-APPELLEE(S) also caused George Lyons to face fraudulent N.S.F. charges. The above conversation was audiotape by this writer.

Collusion:

15. Another illegal action of Court Receiver Dale Cooper: was during negotiations Patricia Ann Lyons and Attorney Brian Lavan illegal actions of stating that Patricia Ann Lyons was the owner of Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision aka 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan 48169. This writer can prove that Patricia A. Lyons removed herself as resident agent 1 month after Lyons, Inc. was started. See Letter from Consumer & Industry services in 1993.

16. REAL ESTATE REPRESENTATION DIRECTOR Ann Milburn, ordering Patricia A. Lyons to either become a Real Estate Broker or remove herself from the Corporate records of Lyons, Inc.

17. That only a Licensed Broker could become a resident agent, Brian Lavan had knowledge to this fact. And Patricia Ann Lyons received illegal funds from Lyons, Inc. A Michigan Corporation for stating that she was legal owner of Lot 88 Arrowhead, 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. 48169

18. Other evidence is a letter from Patricia A. Lyons to Consumer & Industry services REAL ESTATE REPRESENTATION DIRECTOR Ann Milburn , Statement in the letter states I Patricia A. Lyons is removing myself from Lyons, Inc. This was done in a corp. meeting, and witnessed in 1993.

19. So Dale Cooper did not get a clear title to Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision. Aka 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. And that George Lyons is the true holder of Lyons, Inc.

20. And now request the property of 5654 Shoshoni Pass; Pinckney, Mi. back and that Dale Cooper should be responsible to return Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision, AKA 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan. And time is of the essence. Or possibly charged along with Patricia A. Lyons and Attorney Brian Lavan and Court Receiver Dale Cooper for Tortuous Interference and Civil Conspiracy.

21. Another possible illegal action of Court receiver Dale Cooper: was during negotiations on 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney and Brian Lavan was stating the Patricia Ann Lyons was the owner of Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision. Patricia Ann Lyons stated to Dale Cooper on the offer to purchase of Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision aka 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi.

22. “Patricia A. Lyons stated to Dale Cooper on the offer to purchase lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision we had an offer of $ 267,000.00 why am I accepting an offer for $ 220,000.00.

23. Dale Cooper court receiver stated “because their still a lot of things that have to be done to finish the Property. Patricia Ann Lyons, what things. Patricia Ann Lyons requested a list. Dale Cooper promised that he would acquire that List. THEN COURT RECEIVER DALE COOPER: came into the Courtroom as stated before this paragraph and Forced George Lyons and Patricia Ann Lyons to sign the illegal Warranty Deed to the reduce price of the property on Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision, aka 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi.

24. IMPORTANT: STORZBACH PAID LYONS BUILDERS, INC. $70,400.00 AND LYONS BUILDERS, INC. PERFORMED OVER $169,000.00+ WORTH OF WORK PER LIVINGSTON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT.

25, AND FRIBERG’S COMPLAINT TO THE STATE OF MICHIGAN CONSUMER & INDUSTRY SERVICES, THERE CASE WAS CLOSED AND FOUNDED THAT LYONS BUILDERS DID NO VIOLATIONS.

26. Patricia Ann Lyons informed George Lyons the rightful owner of Lyons, Inc. A Michigan
Corporation: and informed Him that the offer to purchase Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision aka 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. the reduction of the property Shoshoni Pass. Pinckney, Mi to $ 220,000.00.
27. After receiving this information George Lyons went to the office of Court Receiver Dale Cooper and asks him if it true about the reduction of the property at 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. And is he not accepting the other two offers on Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. that were $ 265,000.00 and $275,000.00.

28. VERY IMPORTANT: After finding about this problem from the ex-wife Patricia A. Lyons. George Lyons went to Dale Cooper office of court receiver Dale Cooper: George Lyons asked Dale Cooper why you reduced the price of 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi 48169 to $220,000.00 Dale Cooper stated “Because there still has to be a lot of work done on Shoshoni Pass,

29. George Lyons then showed Court Receiver Dale Cooper a copy of an Appraisal for $300,000.00 on Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision aka 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. Court receiver Dale Cooper had his secretary copy the appraisal.

30. George Lyons asked Court receiver Dale Cooper, “Patti Lyons told me that the reason you’re taking the offer of $220,000.00 because there things have to be done on the property. Dale Cooper stated to George Lyons. George Lyons stated to Dale Cooper “I have a certificate of Occupancy”.

31. Then George Lyons then stated, “There nothing has to be done on Shoshoni Pass, and the Livingston County Building Department does not give out Certificate of Occupancy and thing has to be done.” I have a Certificate of Occupancy Dale. Here it is. There is nothing to be done on the property”.

32. Then George Lyons stated “And that you promise her a list of things to be done on the property”. (5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. 48169”.

33. “Dale Cooper court receiver : Yes and I will get you a copy of those things have to be done, I’ll get a copy of the list to Patti, George I would like to have a copy, I make sure you get copy to”. AUDIO TAPE CONVERSATION.

34. Dale Cooper statement back to Attorney Grievance committee letter on 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan. I never heard of a list and I never promised such a list for 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan. This letter was support by Patricia A. Lyons Attorney Brian Lavan.

35. THIS WAS NOT TRUE. SEE AUDIO TAPE CONVERSATION AND DOCUMENTS AND APPRAISIAL THAT WAS GIVEN TO COURT RECEIVER DALE COOPER.
36. Dale Cooper: This was a cover-up and possible illegal action on Court receiver DALE COOPER. Also a cover-up letter from Patricia Ann Lyons attorney BRIAN LAVAN. FOOTNOTE: BRIAN LAVAN representing Lyons & Builders, Inc. against Steebers. Now Patricia Ann Lyons Divorce attorney. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

37. FOOTNOTE: TO THE BUILDERS READING THIS EMAIL: George Lyons state what are you saying there nothing to be done, we have a CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY ON THE PROPERTY AND Livingston County Building department would not grant a certification of Occupation without everything being done. “Did you say you’ll get a list of thing to be done to Patti (ex-wife)”?

38. Dale Cooper stated yes and I can you get her a copy. DALE COOPER STATED, AND I’LL SEE YOU GET A COPY TO. BUT A LETTER TO ATTORNEY GREIVANCE COMMITTEE DALE COOPER STATED I HAVE NO IDEA OF A LIST.

39. FOOTNOTE: Evidence shows Storzbach only paid Lyons Builders, Inc. $70,400.00 and through the Livingston County Building Department Lyons Builders, Inc. preformed $ 169,000.00 worth of work on Storzbach’s project a $98,000.00 difference.

40. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT: Court Receiver DALE COOPER then came in to Court and force Patricia Ann Lyons and George Edward Lyons to signing a Warranty deed for lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision aka 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan 48169 under duress. As stated in the audiotape.

41. NOW THIS IS IMPORTANT: Being upset because Patricia Ann Lyons never received a copy of thing to be done on 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan, Patricia Ann Lyons makes a complaint to the ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE

42. Court Receiver Dale Cooper reduced the price of Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision aka 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan. And then state back to Attorney Grievance committee that he Dale Cooper stated he had no knowledge about a reduction or a List. On 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. This false and misleading on court receiver Dale Cooper part.

43. George Lyons is asking the Attorney Grievance committee to investigate Court Receiver Dale Cooper an investigate the reduction of the price of 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. and that Dale Cooper promised to Patricia Lyons and George Lyons a list that caused the reduction from $ 265,000.00 to $ 220,000.00 That Patricia A. Lyons nor George Lyons never did received said reduction list that was promised from court receiver Dale Cooper.

44. IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER: And through the Consumer & Industry services a complaint filed Ronald and Virginia Storzbach that Lyons Builders, Inc. preformed $ 169,000.00 and approved by Livingston County Building Department, and Ronald and Virginia Storzbach only paid $70,400.00 and Friberg’s complaint to the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services complaint was closed and C&I stated the Lyons Builders, Inc. DID NO VIOLATIONS

45. And on Richard and Ann Friberg’s Complaint to Consumer & Industry services closed complaint stated that Lyons Builders, Inc. DID NO VIOLATIONS. Both suits were fraudulent to embezzle money from Lyons Builders, Inc. See permits history both on Storzbach’s and Friberg’s projects.

46. Honorable Judge Stanley Laterille combined both Ronald and Virginia Storzbach and Richard and Ann Friberg’s suits. Which combined other attorney grievance letters of attorney’s Richard Conlin, Brian Lavan.

Respectfully submitted




______________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679



State of Michigan
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF AN ATTORNEYS:

ATTORNEY NAMES: JOHN K. HARRIS (P 29060)
AND CHARLES W. WIDMAIER (P 38376)
Of Harris & Literski
Attorneys for Plaintiff
822 E. Grand River Avenue
Brighton, Michigan 48116
(810)-229-9340

Case no: 96-15464 Honorable DANIEL A. BURRESS

IVO MARCICH AND HEATHER MARCICH
HUSBAND AND WIFE
V.
LYONS BUILDERS, INC. A Michigan corporation
And George E. Lyons

Charles Widmaier Committed perjury by stating that George Lyons committed Fraud, to enter a law suit into the Livingston County Courts. All building contracts were under the American Arbitration Clause:


To Whom It May Concern: ATTACHED THIS COMPLAINT TO CHARLES WIDMAIER AND CURT AND MARY ANN LALONDE.

1. Before the above suit the company HARRIS & LITERSKI, Attorneys John Harris and Charles Widmaier both represented Lyons Builders, Inc. AKA Lyons & Associates, Inc. approx. around August 5th 1991, in the case Spinale vs. Lyons & Associates, (aka Lyons Builders, Inc.) And against Attorney Brian Lavan for illegally removing George Lyons and Lyons & Associates, Inc. 201 S. East Street, Brighton, Mi. And their legal advise.

2. Attorneys John Harris and Charles Widmaier then represented past clients Ivo and Heather Marcich H/W. Against Lyons & Associates, Inc. (aka Lyons Builders, Inc.) H/W. is a huge Conflict of Interest.

3. Overwhelming evidence was given to attorney Charles Widmaier proving that at this time Ivo and Heather Marcich and Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde were embezzling funds from Lyons Builders, Inc.

4. The false allegations of Ivo and Heather Marcich, used monies that was owed to Lyons Builders, Inc. to fight Lyons Builders, Inc. The statement from Livingston County Building department permit history proves this. (See Permit History of Livingston County Building department, that the Marcich’s and Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde cause false allegation of N.S.F. Charges against Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Edward Lyons.
5. A motion to remove attorneys John Harris and Charles Widmaier for CONFLICT OF INTEREST, this motion was denied. An Emergency motion to Disqualify Judge Daniel A. Burress. Overwhelming evidence along with audiotape transcripts on the Marcich’s, proves their fraudulent action.

6. Audiotapes conversation with Charles Widmaier going over with George Edward Lyons giving full knowledge that his clients were committing fraud, and embezzlement.

7. This writer believes that these attorneys possibly committed collusion, and malicious prosecution. Also supported their clients Ivo and Heather Marcich to embezzle a $ 23,000.00 easement owed to Lyons & Associates, Inc (aka Lyons Builders, Inc.

Footnote: Attorney Charles Widmaier made false statements that on both clients Lalonde and Marcich that George Edward Lyons committed fraud, to get the lawsuits into the Livingston County Court system, Footnote all building contracts are under an Arbitration Clause. This statement also includes the other Attorney’s which are been sent to the Attorney Grievance Committee

8. These actions can be prove through audiotapes, and documents that will be presented to the Livingston County Court system, and to John Harris and Charles Widmaier.

9. That Ivo and Heather Marcich and Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde made fraudulent statements to Consumer & Industry services, to get supportive action from Consumer & Industry services. The possibility actions of Attorneys John Harris and Charles Widmaier, shows obstruction of justice, collusion, and malicious prosecution.



Respectfully submitted





______________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169



State of Michigan
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF AN ATTORNEYS:

ATTORNEY NAMES: JOHN K. HARRIS (P 29060)
AND CHARLES W. WIDMAIER (P 38376)
Of Harris & Literski
Attorneys for Plaintiff
822 E. Grand River Avenue
Brighton, Michigan 48116
(810)-229-9340

Case no: 96-15464 Honorable Judge Stanley Laterille

CURT & MARY ANN LALONDE
HUSBAND AND WIFE
V.
LYONS BUILDERS, INC. A Michigan corporation
And George E. Lyons

To Whom It May Concern:

Charles W. Widmaier; Committed perjury by stating that George Lyons committed Fraud, to enter a law suit into the Livingston County Courts. All building contracts were under the American Arbitration Clause:


1. Before the above suit the company HARRIS & LITERSKI, Attorneys John Harris and Charles Widmaier both represented Lyons Builders, Inc. AKA Lyons & Associates, Inc. approx. around August 5th 1991, in the case Spinale vs. Lyons & Associates, (aka Lyons Builders, Inc.) And against Attorney Brian Lavan for Illegally removing George Lyons and Lyons & Associates, Inc. 201 S. East Street, Brighton, Mi. And their legal advise.

2. Attorneys John Harris and Charles Widmaier then represented past clients Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde H/W. Against Lyons & Associates, Inc. (aka Lyons Builders, Inc.) H/W. is a huge Conflict of Interest.

3. Overwhelming evidence was given to attorney John Harris and Charles Widmaier proving that at this time Ivo and Heather Marcich and Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde were embezzling funds from Lyons Builders, Inc.

4. FOOTNOTE: ATTORNEY JOHN HARRIS WAS THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR OF RICHARD AND ANN FRIBERG.

AND ANN FRIBERG WORKED FOR LIVINGSTON COUNTY Psychologist Consulting CENTER.

5. CAN THIS BE JUST A CHANCE IN A TRILLION? ON FRIEND OF THE COURT DR. ZIPPER AND FORENCIC CENTER IN YPSILANTI, MI. SEE THE EVIDENCE ON DR. RICHARD ZIPPER AND JUDITH THOMPSON AND ATTORNEY MARK SPICKARD COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY: REMEMBER FRIBERG WERE THE FIRST TO MAKE A COMPLAINT AND LYONS BUILDERS, INCWAS FOUND BY THE STATE OF MICHIGAN THAT LYONS BUILDERS, INC. DID NO VIOLATIONS AGAINST FRIBERG’S

Plaintiff-Appellant is JUST SHOWING YOU THE CONNECTION.

6. The false allegations of Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde, used monies that was owed to Lyons Builders, Inc. to fight Lyons Builders, Inc. The statement from Livingston County Building department permit history proves this. (See Permit History, that the Marcich’s cause false allegation of N.S.F. Charges against Lyons Builders, Inc. and George Edward Lyons.

IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT
Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde & Ivo Marcich Framed George Lyons for false N.S.F. Charges, see evidence

7. A motion to remove attorneys John Harris and Charles Widmaier for CONFLICT OF INTEREST, this motion was denied.

8. An Emergency motion to Disqualifying Judge Stanley Laterille.

9. Overwhelming evidence along with audiotape transcripts on the Plaintiffs, proving their fraudulent action. Audiotapes conversation with Charles Widmaier going over with George Edward Lyons giving full knowledge that his clients were committing fraud, and embezzlement.

10. This writer believes that these attorneys possibly committed collusion, and malicious prosecution. Also supported their clients Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde to embezzle money from Lyons & Associates, Inc.

11. These actions can be proving through audiotapes and documents that were presented to the Livingston County Court system.
12. Charles Widmaier who represented Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde made fraudulent statements to Consumer & Industry services, to get supportive actions from Consumer & Industry services. The possibility actions of Attorney Charles Widmaier, shows possible obstruction of justice, collusion, and malicious prosecution.

13. CURT AND MARYANN LALONDE SET-UP GEORGE LYONS FOR FALSE N.S.F. CHARGES SEE EVIDENCE THAT THE COURT RECEIVED AND ATTORNEY WIDMAIER RECEIVED. AND AUDIOTAPES FOLLOW THE PAPER TRAIL. PROVES THE ABOVE.


Footnote: Attorney Charles Widmaier made false statements that on both clients Lalonde and Marcich that George Edward Lyons committed fraud, to get the lawsuits into the Livingston County Court system, Footnote all building contracts are under an Arbitration Clause. This statement also includes the other Attorney’s which are been sent to the Attorney Grievance Committee



Respectfully submitted



_______________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679

State of Michigan Important with Kopp’s
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF AN ATTORNEY:

ATTORNEY NAME: MARK T. SPICKARD P 47995
Of Gateman and Spickard, PLC
1360 W. Grand River Ave.
Howell, Mi 48843
(517) 546-4700
E-mail: gatesman_spickard@hotmail.com

False police report – Entering without permission/Honorable Frank Del Vero

Case no: 99-1823-SM

To Whom It May Concern:

State of Michigan
V.
George Edward Lyons

Attorney Mark T. Spickard Committed perjury and Obstruction of Justice, and wrongfully supported the Livingston County Prosecutor attorney: By Not coming forth with information that the Kopp’s gave permission to the Plaintiff-Appellant to enter into 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan to tape conversation.

That the Livingston County Prosecuting attorney’s committed malicious of prosecution against the Plaintiff-Appellant. That the Livingston County conspired with Ypsilanti Forensic Center to Stop the Plaintiff-Appellant from acquiring due process, which falls under the Plaintiff-Appellant Constitution Rights.

That the Livingston County Prosecuting attorney filed malicious prosecution against the Plaintiff-Appellant for the following:

The Plaintiff-Appellant went to Pinckney Police, Hamburg Township Police, Michigan State Police, Livingston County Sheriff, and the Ann Arbor Federal Bureau of Investigation. All agencies were taped recorded. All agency supported Plaintiff-Appellant, the Livingston County Prosecutor refused to act on all documents, and evidence that the Plaintiff-Appellant presented and proves that Livingston County Prosecutor committed malicious prosecution against the Plaintiff-Appellant. The same documents and evidence were given to the News Media.

That the Ypsilanti Forensic Center filed fraudulent reports to the Livingston County Court system by Judith S. Thompson, Ph. D. Licensed Clinical Psychologist Consulting Forensic Examiner.

IMPORTANT:
The Livingston County Prosecutor committed the following on malicious prosecution against the Plaintiff-Appellant in

A. Supporting False charges against the Plaintiff-Appellant for ENTERING WITHOUT PERMISSION. THAT WAS FALSE FILE BY KARL FRANCIS KOPP DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

A. Supporting False N.S.F. Charges against the Plaintiff-Appellant.

b. Supporting False Domestic abuse charges against the Plaintiff-Appellant.

These statements are supported by audio tape Conversation and Case Files of the above cases.

1. Attorney Mark T. Spickard was court appointed attorney for George Lyons for the false police report of Karl F. Kopp of George Edward Lyons marital residence at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. 48169. FOR ENTERING WITHOUT PERMISSION.

2. Prior to the court hearing Attorney Mark T. Spickard and George Lyons sat down and George Lyons played a audio taped conversation with Marian J. Kopp ½ of the Land Contract holders for 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan along with Karl F. Kopp the other ½ her husband in the conversation with Marian Kopp, she is giving permission to George Lyons permission, to enter 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi.

3. (This conversation was played to court appointed attorney Mark T. Spickard, and while this was done being done George Lyons was taping recording Attorney Mark Spickard listening to said conversation, and now that Attorney Mark Spickard having full knowledge that the false police report against George Lyons was in fact not true.)

4. And all court appointed Attorney Mark Spickard had to do was take the audiotape recording of Marian Kopp granting George Lyons permission to take resident back into 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. Before Judge Delvero which prove to the Judge Delvero that indeed that George Lyons did not commit entering without permission.

5. Moreover, the Kopp’s would have been charged making a false police report. Instead, Livingston County prosecutor took a Motion, that George Lyons should see the Center for Forensic Psychiatry before Judith S. Thompson, Ph. D. Licensed Clinical Psychologist Consulting Forensic Examiner.

FOOTNOTE: Ann Friberg of Richard and Ann Friberg on 5654 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan worked for many years for the Livingston County Mental Health department, and she could have used her influence to put a bad light against George Edward Lyons.

6. The same tape conversation was played for Center for Forensic
Psychoanalysis before Judith S. Thompson, Ph. d. Licensed Clinical Psychologist Consulting Forensic Examiner. And George Edward
Lyons taped recorded Judith S. Thompson, PhD. listening to same conversation of Marian Kopp giving permission of George Edward Lyons permission to take possession of 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan. Again all Judith S. Thompson, PhD. Had to do was to state George Edward Lyons had permission to take possession of 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi.

7. But because George Edward Lyons had so much evidence against Attorney’s Judge’s and past clients, and Karl and Marian Kopp, and Patricia A. Lyons ex-wife of George E. Lyons, and State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services. This writer believes Judith Thompson PHD. Would rather protect these people that are in this document, she wrote a letter to Judge Delvero that George Edward Lyons was incompetent to stand trial. Losing the chance to take back his home for 15 years 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan 48169.

8. This writer believes that Prosecuting Attorney Mr. Daniel J. Garber, and Judith J. Thompson PHD. Possible committed collusion with Court appointed attorney Mark T. Spickard against George Lyons. Mark T. Sicker the findings of Judith S. Thompson, Ph. D were that George Lyons was competent to stand trial. THESE AUDIO TAPES WILL PROVE THIS AND THAT Court appointed attorney Mark T. Spickard and Judith S. Thompson, PHD. Or Charles Widmaier could be charged for TORTIOUS INTERFERRANCE and CIVIL CONSPIRCEY.

9. The case was suspended until George Lyons regained competency. By the action of Court Attorney Mark T. Spickard and Prosecuting Attorney Daniel J. Garber. George Lyons lost his martial home that George Lyons had over $ 800,000.00 at today assessment, of equity in 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi.

10. This equity could have paid in full Karl and Marian Kopp the monies that he borrowed from the Kopp’s to finish 5648 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Michigan. The actions of Attorney Mark Spickard and Daniel J. Garber Livingston County Prosecuting attorney could have possibly cause malicious prosecution and collusion on the part of these attorneys. Other evidence will be presented.

11. WAS COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY MARK SPICKARD AND Judith S. Thompson, Ph. D. Licensed Clinical Psychologist Consulting Forensic Examiner. WORKING FOR LIVINGSTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR? FOLLOW THE PAPER TRAIL GIVEN TO LIVINGSTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR AND LISTEN TO AUDIO TAPES.

12. THIS WAS THE COURT WAY IN STOPPING GEORGE EDWARD LYONS TO ACQUIRE HIS HOME BACK, AND STOPPING GEORGE EDWARD LYONS IN FILING SUITS TO ABOVE PEOPLE AND COURT SYSTEMS FOR INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES AND OTHER ISSUES. THIS MAY HAPPEN TO YOU.


False charges of entering without permission:
On voice mail:

13. Marian: The keys to your house are in the kitchen draw: and if you cannot get them, I will get them for you, with or without Karl’s permission, but I have to work now.

14. Big Boy’s at Whitmore Lake:

August 14, 1999 8:45am

George: They put up that fence next door to my house.
Marian: I know
George: an without a permit
Marian: then did you tell them?
George: not yet, ah before we go into this, what are we going to do in court
Marian: for what
George: when I go to court, are you going to be there? (Asking Marian to tell official she gave permission to move back into 1194Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. So George Lyons would not get charged with a false entering without permission.)
Marian: I have no idea, Karl has not told me one thing about it, and did they send us anything
George: They should of; I gave you a copy of
Marian: You showed me a copy of what they sent you, did they send us anything
George: they did not send you anything
Marian: I never get the mail
George: well I either have to subpoena you, or
Marian: you are going to subpoena me, because I told you, to do what you what to do.
They went to the house and no one was there did they ever come with the police to the house, when you were there
George: I have no idea; the neighbor said that they did
Marian: you could say that you moved out and then

George: No my furniture in still in there, the electric bill is still under my name, no it was still under my name, no I didn’t change it
Marian: I went down a

George: When
Marian: I was when Patti moved out
George: everything was still in my name, the telephone was still in my name, the electric was still in my name, and the gas was still in my name
George: On the house, you said go ahead in, that was you exact words.
Marian: George
George: go ahead; I am sorry Marian, am I
Marian: I did say go a head in. And go and do what you want to do

George: You said you were going to give me the house
Marian: I still will if I ever get out o

Dan Gerber: I have over 60 audiotapes on the Kopp’s you have a copy of a brief conversations, any others I will be happy To copy then, or have them reviewed for no tampering.

14. Because of this cover-up George Lyons lost an $800,000.00 house at today pricing, that the Kopp’s only loaned $ 90,000.00 and received $24,000.00 equals the Kopp’s only are owed $66,000.00 but the audiotapes prove they embezzled the house and caused huge losses to the Lyons Family for their lies. Follow the paper trail, and listen to the audiotapes.

15. THE KOPP’S Defendant’s-Appellee(s) and along with the Livingston County Prosecutor TOOK ADVANTAGE OF GEORGE LYONS WHEN HE WAS BEING GANG-UP ON AND THE ILLEGALLY TOOK 1194 CAMELOT, PINCKNEY, MI. 48169.

Respectfully submitted




_________________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679


State of Michigan
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF AN ATTORNEY:

ATTORNEY NAME: PATRICK GLADNEY (P-39948)
Attorney at Law
9880 E. Grand River
Brighton, Mi 48116
(810) 229-6787

CASE NO. 98-0467-SM
To Whom It May Concern:

State of Michigan
V.
George Edward Lyons
Defendant

Date: Thursday, June 4, 1998 before the Honorable Frank R. Del Vero, District Judge Howell, Michigan – Thursday, June 4th 1998.

1. Attorney Patrick Gladney court appointed attorney for George Edward Lyons

2. Possible Conflict of Interest: File date: August 30 1996.

Without knowledge to George Edward Lyons Attorney Patrick Gladney placed a Real Property Lien, on 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan. Aka as Lots 28, 29, and part of the subdivision of Camelot Shores # 3 subdivision, located in Hamburg Township, Livingston County. Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Commonly

As: 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan Tax I.D. No.-14-36-301-046

This Attorney Real Property Lien shall be for FIVE-THOUSAND-NINETY FIVE-HUNDRED-DOLLARS-AND NO/100 ($5,905.00) plus all allowable interest and cost.
3. No notification was given to George Edward Lyons that this lien was being placed on property at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. 48169 by Attorney Patrick Gladney.

4. Patrick Gladney represented George Lyons and Lyons & Associates, Inc. aka LYONS BUILDERS, INC. in the past. After reviewing audiotapes and documents that, a first year attorney could have won. This action could prove collusion.
5. George Lyons of Lyons & Associates, Inc. aka LYONS BUILDERS, INC. Barter with Attorney Patrick Gladney. George Lyons paid the cost that was quoted to George Lyons in the case that Attorney Patrick Gladney in full, the cost was $ 3,000.00.

6. George Lyons Company Lyons Builders, Inc. See attached Invoice from the office of Patrick O. Gladney Dated July 31, 1996 final adjustment amount due $ .00

7. Again, George Lyons had no knowledge that this ATTORNEY Real property lien was executed.

On Thursday, June 4th, 1998 attorney Patrick Gladney was court appointed attorney for Case No. 98-0467 State of Michigan v. George Edward Lyons defendant. Prior 2 years before Attorney Patrick O. Gladney filed his false Real Property lien against George Edward Lyons.

8. During the Jury hearing George Edward Lyons was told by Attorney Patrick O. Gladney, that he was not putting George Edward Lyons on the stand to testify, George Edward Lyons begged Attorney Patrick Gladney, to be placed on the stand to testify, Attorney Patrick Gladney refused. George Edward Lyons has evidence that this conversation took place. ON AUDIO TAPES.

9. Because of the false Real Property Lien by Attorney Patrick O. Gladney, it shows a conflict of Interest on Attorney Patrick O. Gladney.

10. SEE ALL THE FILES THAT WAS SET BEFORE GEORGE LYONS OVER 2 FEET OF FILES SEE COURT REPORT VIDEO TAPE. WHY WOULD GEORGE LYONS HAVE ALL THIS EVIDENCE WITH OUT GOING ON THE STAND THAT PATRICK GLADNEY ILLEGAL REFUSE GEORGE LYONS TO GO ON AN TESTIFY.

11. ALSO GEORGE LYONS AUDIO TAPED THIS CONVERSATION WITH PATRICK GLADNEY. GLADNEY CAN NOT REFUSE A PERSON TO TESTIFY.

12. In addition, refusing to have George Edward Lyons testify before the jury, Patrick Gladney lost the case. And this writer believes that Attorney Patrick O. Gladney could be possibly charge with obstruction of justice, and possible collusion.

13. Other evidence against Attorney Patrick O. Gladney will be presented to this committee. Livingston County Prosecutor PAMELA J. MAAS-P40452 MADE FALSE STATEMENTS TO THE JURY, SEE TRANSCRIPTS.

Respectfully submitted




__________________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679




State of Michigan
Attorney Grievance Commission
243 West Congress
Marquette Building, Suite 256
Detroit, Michigan 48226-3256

REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION OF AN ATTORNEY:

ATTORNEY NAME: Livingston County Prosecutor PAMELA J. MAAS-P40452
210 South Highlander Way
Howell, Michigan 48843
517-546-1850

CASE NO. 98-0467-SM

To Whom It May Concern:

State of Michigan
V.
George Edward Lyons
Defendant



Date: Thursday, June 4, 1998 before the Honorable Frank R. Del Vero, District Judge Howell, Michigan – Thursday, June 4th 1998.

Livingston County Prosecutor Pamela Maas, committed obstruction of Justice for the Following REASONS:

JURY TRIAL

1. Ms. Pamela Maas made her opening statement. Per transcripts.

2. The first of those witnesses will be a Patricia Lyons. An Patricia Lyons will tell you about how on that date she was living in the home with her ex-husband. Now, they had been divorced prior to that time, but she was allowing him to remain in the house she had been given during the divorce as means of helping him out.

3. Patricia Lyons was not helping George Lyons, George Lyons made all Mortgage, electric, gas, and phone payments, George Lyons and Lyons Builders, Inc. was in the hole $387,000.00 because clients were not making there payments, Patricia A. Lyons was making $34,000.00 and she would not make house payments, electric payments, gas payments, not even to put our daughter in a more protected environment.

The following paragraphs will explain a lot.

See Brian Lavan grievance letter:

4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Attorney Brian Lavan in the State of Michigan in the Circuit Court for the County of Livingston.

5. Represented ex-wife Patricia A. Lyons and Attorney Brian Lavan filed a Complaint for Divorce April 2nd 1996, Case No. 96-23807

6. BEFORE Honorable Judge Burress, represented Patricia Ann Lyons, in the complaint of Divorce in the complaint for Divorce, making a false statement against George Edward Lyons that See page 3. Paragraph 13 George Lyons asked Patricia A. Lyons,

7.That conversation was:

“Patti, on page 3 paragraph 13. Injunction: PATRICIA A. LYONS Making a false statement against Defendant(George Lyons) has physically abused Plaintiff in the past and because of the action now taken by Plaintiff (Patricia A. Lyons), in the filing of this divorce action, Plaintiff is justly fearful for her physical well being and is justly fearful that Defendant will assault, beat, molest or wound her unless he is restrained from doing so by order of this Court. The writer read word by word to Patricia A. Lyons and then recorded it.

Defendant, asked Patricia Ann Lyons why in this in the complaint of divorce, I never hit you, or strike you in the 18 years we been together why is this in here, Patricia A. Lyons stated ,its been 20 I know you didn’t, Brian stated it was for better negotiation.”) THIS IS ON AUDIOTAPE.

8. FALSE STATEMENT: In Court Transcript page 18 of paragraph two: You will hear how that while—while Mrs. Lyons was on the telephone with her friend that the Defendant came in and was yelling and saying, what’s going on.

9. Transcript page 76: Ms. Maas cross examine Kathy Fett: All right, now, during the course of time when you were having this conversation, did you ever hear another voice on the other end of the line?

Kathy Fett: STATED NO.

10. This is on Attorney Ms. Maas part is deliberating tainting: Ms. Maas statement to the jury that you her that George Lyons was YELLING AND SAYING WHATS GOING ON. When Kathy Fett stated that she never, hear another voice on the other end of the line. Making the trial a miss trial, by deliberating tainting the jury, and misleading the Jury with false statements.

11. But in the Police Statement to Pinckney Police, Mrs. Fett made, that Mrs. Fett did hear George Lyons. Now was the statement on the police report true or the statement in the court true, or was Mrs. Fett come in court to get George Lyons out of the house, so Mrs. Fett and Patricia A. Lyons could be partners in the 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. property and embezzle the property by making a false police report to Pinckney police.

12. Audiotape conversation with Attorney James Fett, where he stated that on the false police report Mrs. Fett made. That Kathy Fett (ex-wife of Attorney James Fett) came to him and requested $ 135,000.00 from there children College Fund to go into partnership to be use to pay off Land Contract to Karl and Marian Kopp for 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. 48169. Attorney James Fett refused. This is call motive in filing a false police report to remove George Lyons from 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. 48169 this was audio taped conversation.


13. Prosecuting Attorney Ms. Maas, study the police report that Kathy Fett did state that she hear George Lyons in the back ground, and now on the Stand she completely reverse her statement, Prosecuting Attorney Ms. Maas instead of asking Kathy Fett, wait a minute Mrs. Fett you stated on the police report you hear George Lyons yelling, and now your saying you did hear Mr. Lyons on the other end of the Phone.

14. Instead, Prosecuting attorney tried to cover it up. The Prosecuting attorney works for the State of Michigan in trying to find out the truth. Not in protecting, and helping someone trying to embezzle her husbands

15. Portion of the property that at today date worth over $ 800,000.00 to $ 1,100,000.00 that the defendant could have used to protect his house, and also pay for legal representation, and most of all protect my daughters.



Respectfully submitted:




______________________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679


In closing:

1. JUST A THOUGHT EVERYONE THOUGHT THAT EVERYONE ELSE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH, AND THEIR INDIVIDUAL LIES WOULD NOT BE SEEN BECAUSE THEY THOUGHT THAT EVERYONE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH AGAINST GEORGE LYONS AND HIS COMPANIES, AND THEY WOULD GET AWAY WITH THERE LITTLE LIES.

2. PROBLEM IS EVERYONE WAS LIEING AND THIS Plaintiff-Appellant CAUGHT THEM ON AUDIO TAPE AND THROUGH TRUE DOCUMENTS.

3. This writer will be giving many other issues that are not expressed in this document, to the Attorney Grievance committee and to the Michigan Bar association to be investigated on these attorneys: THIS DOCUMENT IS JUST OPENING THE DOORS.

4. This document should be applied to Richard Conlin, Brian Lavan, Dale Cooper, and Patrick Gladney Charles Widmaier, and other attorneys for comparison in collusion and tortuous Interference and Civil conspiracy. Restriction of trade.

5. And on the other hand Court referee Gerald Edit Mark Spickard, Judith Thompson PHD, and Dr. Richard Zipper on there using a secret way the court and Prosecuting attorney’s uses to control George Edward Lyons even when your telling the truth. And charges of the above for collusion and tortuous Interference.

6. On the DEFENDANT’S-APPELLEE(S) Marcich having full Knowledge that all of the above people were doing wrong, and took advantage of it to make a false forfeiture, and acquire illegal possession of 3155 Betty Lyons Lane, Pinckney, Michigan And costing this writer endless problems, that this writer could of used its money to pay for legal representation. And stop years of misery to this writer. The Kopp already are being brought to court for tortuous Interference and Civil Conspiracy

THE EVIDENCE ON THE ABOVE ATTORNEY’S IS A VERY SMALL AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE AGAINST THEM IN THESE DOCUMENTS. MORE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE WILL BE SHOWN IN FUTURE FILING OF SUITS Through the Federal Court System.

7. The News Media are being contacted on these issues and other issues that caused millions of dollars were lost to the following companies LYONS BUILDERS, Inc. and Lyons, Inc. (Realtors) and George Lyons. This email notice is sent out to you to protect you, and to expose these people.

8. This email is also sent to Consumer & Industry services and the above attorney’s and these past clients and Defendant(s)-Appellee(s).

9. Forcing these people to both come out of the shadows and face me in court so I can prove my allegations.

10. My fellow brothers and Sisters, Realtors and Builders nothing will happen to you if you only ask questions about these people and these cases. Please go out and ask questions and protect your future, in Real Estate and Building. People have told me not to expose these wrongful actions to anyone it will put you in a bad light.

11. But I would rather stand up in that bad light, and show people so they would not have to go through the same problems, and if you already gone through something similar, please call me or e-mail me.
On the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services, Contact the Real Estate Board members and the Residential Builders members Contact the Board members. And just ask two questions. WILL YOU PROVE THAT YOU DID NOT DOCTOR GEORGE EDWARD LYONS BROKERS LICENSE? AND WILL YOU MEET WITH GEORGE EDWARD LYONS AND SHOW THAT YOU’RE INNOCENT OF THESE CHARGES in any public form.


Respectfully submitted






______________________
George Edward Lyons
P.O. Box 226
Pinckney, Michigan 48169
734-657-1679
stgeorge7157@yahoo.com



Copy of State of Michigan Court rules on Disqualification 1.4

Disqualification of Judge
MCR 2.003 Disqualification of judge
Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3(C) Disqualification raised by judge
J-6 (September 20, 1996) Formal judicial ethics opinion discussing
Disqualification
JI-34 (December 21, 1990) Informal ethics opinion regarding judges who are
Former prosecuting attorneys
JI-44 (November 1, 1991) Informal ethics opinion regarding “personal
acquaintances” of a judge and “perpetual recusal”
A. Grounds for Disqualification
MCR 2.003(B) sets forth the grounds for disqualification of a judge. That rule
States as follows:
“(B) Grounds. A judge is disqualified when the judge
Cannot impartially hear a case, including but not limited to
Instances in which:
“(1) the judge is personally biased or prejudiced for or
Against a party or attorney.
“(2) The judge has personal knowledge of disputed
Evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.
“(3) The judge has been consulted or employed as an
attorney in the matter in controversy.
“(4) The judge was a partner of a party, attorney for a party,
or a member of a law firm representing a party within the
preceding two years.
“(5) The judge knows that he or she, individually or as a
fiduciary, or the judge’s spouse, parent or child wherever
residing, or any other member of the judge’s family

Page 10
Page 10
Michigan Circuit Court Benchbook
Section 1.4
residing in the judge’s household, has an economic interest
In the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the
Proceeding or has any other more than de minimis interest
That could be substantially affected by the proceeding.
“(6) The judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person within the
Third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse
of such a person:
(a) is a party to the proceeding, or an officer,
director or trustee of a party;
(b) is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
(c) Is known by the judge to have a more than de
minims interest that could be substantially
Affected by the proceeding;
(d) is to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a
material witness in the proceeding.
“A judge is not disqualified merely because the judge’s
former law clerk is an attorney of record for a party in an
action that is before the judge or is associated with a law
firm representing a party in an action that is before the
judge.”
“A judge should raise the issue of disqualification whenever the judge has
cause to believe that grounds for disqualification may exist under MCR
2.003(B).” Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3(C).
MCR 2.003(B)(2) mandates disqualification if a judge is personally biased or
prejudiced for or against a party or attorney. In most cases, a showing of actual
personal bias or prejudice is required. People v Coones, 216 Mich App 721,
726 (1996). However, no showing of actual bias or prejudice is required if a
litigant is denied his or her due process right to an unbiased and impartial
decisionmaker because the judge “might have prejudged the case due to prior
participation [in the case] as an accuser, investigator, fact finder or initial
decisionmaker.” Crampton v Dep’t of State, 395 Mich 347, 351 (1975).
Crampton also discusses other factual situations in which a showing of actual
bias or prejudice is not required.
“Letters, or even complaints, to the Judicial Tenure Commission alone do not
require disqualification of a trial judge.” Ireland v Smith, 214 Mich App 235,
249 (1995). Disqualification is not required when the moving party has filed
a complaint with the Judicial Tenure Commission until the judge has been
privately censured or a complaint has been filed by the Judicial Tenure
Commission itself. People v Bero, 168 Mich App 545, 552 (1988);
Czuprynski v Bay Circuit Judge, 166 Mich App 118, 126-127 (1988).

Page 11
Michigan Judicial Institute © 2004
Page 11
Chapter 1
A judge may not “perpetually recuse” himself or herself from cases of a
particular advocate or particular party because of derogatory comments made
against the judge by the advocate or the party in a particular case, or because
of the judge’s personal dislike of a particular advocate. JI-44 (November 1,
1991).
B. Motion to Disqualify
If a motion is filed, it must be filed within 14 days after the moving party
discovers the ground for disqualification or, if discovery of the ground for
disqualification occurs within 14 days of the trial date, “the motion must be
made forthwith.” MCR 2.003(C)(1). The “untimeliness[ of a motion],
including delay in waiving jury trial, is a factor in deciding whether the
motion should be granted.” Id. A party who failed to move for disqualification
within 14 days of discovering the alleged grounds for disqualification
pursuant to MCR 2.003(C)(1) may not raise the issue for the first time on
appeal. Fischhaber v Gen Motors Corp, 174 Mich App 450, 455-456 (1988).
A motion must be supported by an affidavit setting forth all grounds for
disqualification known at the time the motion is filed. MCR 2.003(C)(2). The
affidavit must be made on personal knowledge, be factually specific, and
demonstrate that the affiant is competent to testify to the facts stated in the
affidavit. MCR 2.119(B)(1)(a)–(c). The challenged judge decides the motion.
MCR 2.003(C)(3).
If the challenged judge denies the motion, and if requested by a party, the
motion shall be referred to the chief judge who shall decide it de novo. MCR
2.003(C)(3)(a). If the challenged judge is the sole judge or chief judge of the
court, and if requested by a party, the motion must be referred to the SCAO,
which must assign it to another judge, who must decide the motion de novo.
Id. “[T]o preserve for appellate review the issue of a denial of a motion for
disqualification of a trial court judge, a party must request referral to the chief
judge of the trial court after the trial court judge’s denial of the party’s
motion.” Welch v Dist Court, 215 Mich App 253, 258 (1996), citing Law
Offices of Lawrence J Stockler PC v Rose, 174 Mich App 14, 23 (1989) and
MCR 2.003(C)(3)(a).
If the motion is granted, “the action shall be assigned to another judge of the
same court, or, if one is not available, the State Court Administrator shall
assign another judge.” MCR 2.003(C)(4).
C. Burden of Proof
“The party moving for the disqualification [of the judge] bears the burden of
proving actual bias or prejudice.” People v Houston, 179 Mich App 753, 756
(1989). “A party seeking to disqualify a judge on the basis of bias or prejudice
bears the heavy burden of overcoming the presumption of judicial
impartiality.” Rust v Rust, 143 Mich App 704, 707 (1985). Bias or prejudice

Page 12
Page 12
Michigan Circuit Court Benchbook
Section 1.5
in fact must be shown, which generally cannot be predicated solely on the
judge’s prior rulings. Kolowich v Ferguson, 264 Mich 668, 670 (1933), and
Armstrong v Ypsilanti Charter Twp, 248 Mich App 573, 597 (2001).
D. Remittal of Disqualification
*Personal bias
or prejudice
regarding an
attorney may be
remitted. J-6
(September 20,
1996).
MCR 2.003(D) provides that although there may be grounds for
disqualification, the judge may still hear the case if the parties waive
disqualification and the judge is willing to participate. However,
disqualification may not be waived if it is based on personal bias or prejudice
concerning a party.* Moreover, unless the attorneys jointly propose the
remittal, the judge should be careful not to solicit or seek or hear comment
regarding the waiver so there is no appearance that the waiver was coerced.
SCAO Form MC 272, Remittal of Disqualification, can be used for the waiver
process.
E. Standard of Review
On appeal, a trial court’s findings of fact on a motion to disqualify a judge are
reviewed for an abuse of discretion, and the judge’s application of the law to
the facts is reviewed de novo. Cain v Dep’t of Corr, 451 Mich 470, 503 n 38
(1996). The reviewing court must be provided with transcripts of the hearings
and affidavits. MacDonald v Ford Motor Co, 117 Mich App 538, 542 (1982);
Czuprynski v Bay Circuit Judge, 166 Mich App 118, 124 (1988).
F. State Bar Ethics Committee
On a pending case, the court may request an ethics opinion from the State Bar
Ethics Committee. The court is not obligated to follow the opinion, but it
would presumably be helpful. Informal contacts can be made with both the
State Court Administrative Office and the State Bar, which are willing to
provide guidance. Although the Judicial Tenure Commission no longer
provides opinions, there are a number of earlier rulings and opinions which
may be helpful.