PERJURY IN LIVINGSTON COUNTY

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)
Act 328 of 1931
CHAPTER LXII

PERJURY

750.422 Perjury committed in courts.

Sec. 422. Perjury committed in courts—Any person who, being lawfully required to depose the truth in any proceeding in a court of justice, shall commit perjury shall be guilty of a felony, punishable, if such perjury was committed on the trial of an indictment for a capital crime, by imprisonment in the state prison for life, or any term of years, and if committed in any other case, by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 15 years.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.422.
Former law: See section 1 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5820; CL 1871, § 7653; How., § 9235; CL 1897, § 11305; CL
1915, § 14972; and CL 1929, § 16563.

750.422a Making intentional material false statement in petition as felony; penalty;
Consecutive terms of imprisonment.

Sec. 422a. (1) An individual who intentionally makes a material false statement in a petition filed under section 16 of chapter X of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175, MCL 770.16, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. (2) The court may order a term of imprisonment imposed under this section to be served consecutively to any other term of imprisonment being served by the
Individual.

History: Add. 2008, Act 411, Imd. Eff. Jan. 6, 2009.

750.423 Definition.

Sec. 423. Definition—Any person authorized by any statute of this state to take an oath, or any person of whom an oath shall be required by law, who shall wilfully swear falsely, in regard to any matter or thing, respecting which such oath is authorized or required, shall be guilty of perjury, a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 15 years.
History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.423.

Former law: See section 2 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5821; CL 1871, § 7654; How., § 9236; CL 1897, § 11307; CL
1915, § 14974; and CL 1929, § 16565.



750.424 Subornation of perjury.
Sec. 424. Subornation of perjury—any person who shall be guilty of subornation of perjury, by procuring another person to commit the crime of perjury, shall be punished as provided in the next preceding section.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.424.
Former law: See section 3 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5822; CL 1871, § 7655; How., § 9237; CL 1897, § 11307; CL 1915, § 14974; and CL 1929, § 16565.

750.425 Inciting or procuring one to commit perjury.

Sec. 425. Inciting or procuring one to commit perjury—Any person who shall endeavor to incite or procure any person to commit the crime of perjury, though no perjury be committed, shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 5 years.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.425.
Former law: See section 4 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5823; CL 1871, § 7656; How., § 9239; CL 1897, § 11309; CL
1915, § 14975; and CL 1929, § 16566.

750.426 Court reasonably believes perjury committed.

Sec. 426. Proceeding when court reasonably believes perjury has been committed—Whenever it shall appear to any court of record that any witness or party who has been legally sworn and examined or has made an affidavit in any proceeding in a court of justice, has testified in such a manner as to induce a reasonable presumption that he has been guilty of perjury therein, the court may immediately commit such witness or party, by an order or process for that purpose, or may take a recognizance with sureties, for his appearing to answer to an indictment for perjury; and thereupon the witness to establish such perjury may, if present, be bound over to the proper court, and notice of the proceedings shall forthwith be given to the prosecuting
Attorney.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.426.
Rendered Wednesday, July 28, 2010 Page 1 Michigan Compiled Laws Complete Through PA 132 of 2010

1. In The beginning Ronald and Virginia Storzbach and their attorney Richard Conlin. Who committed Blackmail or Extortion to acquire illegally funds from George Lyons and his company at Lot 16 Partridge Pointe. . In Stealing funds from George Lyons and his company Lot 16 Partridge Pointe, Brighton, Michigan.

See enclosed document. And Accounting along with copies of Building Contract and checks Lyons paid to construct the Storzbach’s home on Lot 16 Partridge Pointe.

2. The Storzbach and their attorney Richard Conlin committed Extortion or Blackmail against George Lyons and his company to illegal and stealing Lot 16 Partridge Pointe, Brighton. Michigan.


THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)
Act 328 of 1931
CHAPTER XXXIV
EXTORTION

750.213 Malicious threats to extort money.
Sec. 213. Malicious threats to extort money—any person who shall, either orally or by a written or printed
Communication, maliciously threaten to accuse another of any crime or offense, or shall orally or by any
Written or printed communication maliciously threaten any injury to the person or property or mother, father,Husband, wife or child of another with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatever, or With intent to compel the person so threatened to do or refrain from doing any act against his will, shall be Guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 20 years or by a fine of not
More than 10,000 dollars.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.213.Former law: See section 19 of Ch. 153 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5729; CL 1871, § 7528; How., § 9093; CL 1897, § 11488;CL 1915, § 15210; CL 1929, § 16726; Act 188 of 1897; and Act 83 of 1925.

750.214 Extortion by public officers.

Sec. 214. Extortion by public officers—Any person who shall wilfully and corruptly demand and receive from another for performing any service, or any official duty, for which the fee or compensation is established by law, any greater fee or compensation than is allowed or provided for the same, and any public officer, for
whom a salary is provided by law in full compensation for all services required to be performed by him, or by His clerks or deputies, who shall wilfully and corruptly demand and receive from any person any sum of,Money as a fee or compensation for any services required by law to be performed by him in his said office, or By his clerks or deputies, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor;

Both Storzbach’s and their Attorney Conlin committed extortion against George Lyons and his company.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.214.
Former law: See section 22 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5841; CL 1871, § 7674; How., § 9256; CL 1897, § 11326;
CL 1915, § 14993; CL 1929, § 16584; and Act 179 of 1863.
Rendered

BLACKMAIL: The crime involving a threat for purposes of compelling a person to do an act against his or her will, or for purposes of taking the person's money or property.

The term blackmail originally denoted a payment made by English persons residing along the border of Scotland to influential Scottish chieftains in exchange for protection from thieves and marauders.

In blackmail the threat might consist of physical injury to the threatened person or to someone loved by that person, or injury to a person's reputation. In some cases the victim is told that an illegal act he or she had previously committed will be exposed if the victim fails to comply with the demand.

Although blackmail is generally synonymous with Extortion, some states distinguish the offenses by requiring that the former be in writing.

ENCLOSED IS ATTORNEY COLIN LETTER TO GEORGE LYONS AND HIS COMPANY WAS IN WRITING. Blackmail is punishable by a fine, imprisonment, or both.

STORZBACH’S AND HIS ATTORNEY RICHARD CONLIN COMMITTED ILLEGAL AND CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST GEORGE LYONS.



THE STORZBACH’S THEN GOES TO CONSUMER & INDUSTRY SERVICES AND MAKES FALSE POLICE REPORT (filing a fraudulent complaint) TO THE STATE OF MICHIGAN.

1.On Storzbach’s at the beginning. The Storzbach’s paid George Lyons and his company $41,000.00 to start the construction on Lot 16 Partridge Pointe, Pinckney, Mi.

2.George Lyons and his company used that $41,000.00 and started construction on the Storzbach’s project. Per the Building contract George Lyons and his company did over $64,000.00+ in the construction of Storzbach’s project. See accounting of Storzbach. This shows that George Lyons used up the $41,000.00 plus over $28,000.00 of George Lyons own money.

3.Then comes Storzbach’s and his attorney Richard Conlin committing Blackmail or Extortion against George Lyons and his company. To acquire Lot 16 Partridge Pointe, Brighton, Michigan See attached document. That if George Lyons does not sell Lot 16 Partridge Pointe, Brighton, Michigan.

4.Attorney Conlin would place a lien on all 8 lots George Lyons Company owns in Partridge Pointe. Brighton, Michigan. This is called Blackmail or Extortion in the legal system.

5.Once Storzbach’s illegally and criminally acquired Lot 16 Partridge Pointe. The Storzbach illegally and criminally removed George Lyons and his company from Partridge Pointe, Brighton, Michigan. Storzbach then files a fraudulent complaint to State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Services. And commits perjury against George Lyons and his company.

AGAIN THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)
Act 328 of 1931
CHAPTER LXII

PERJURY

750.422 Perjury committed in courts.

Sec. 422. Perjury committed in courts—Any person who, being lawfully required to depose the truth in any proceeding in a court of justice, shall commit perjury shall be guilty of a felony, punishable, if such perjury was committed on the trial of an indictment for a capital crime, by imprisonment in the state prison for life, or any term of years, and if committed in any other case, by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 15 years.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.422.
Former law: See section 1 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5820; CL 1871, § 7653; How., § 9235; CL 1897, § 11305; CL
1915, § 14972; and CL 1929, § 16563.

750.422a Making intentional material false statement in petition as felony; penalty;
Consecutive terms of imprisonment.

Sec. 422a. (1) An individual who intentionally makes a material false statement in a petition filed under section 16 of chapter X of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175, MCL 770.16, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. (2) The court may order a term of imprisonment imposed under this section to be served consecutively to any other term of imprisonment being served by the Individual.

History: Add. 2008, Act 411, Imd. Eff. Jan. 6, 2009.

750.423 Definition.

Sec. 423. Definition—Any person authorized by any statute of this state to take an oath, or any person of whom an oath shall be required by law, who shall wilfully swear falsely, in regard to any matter or thing, respecting which such oath is authorized or required, shall be guilty of perjury, a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 15 years. History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.423.

Former law: See section 2 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5821; CL 1871, § 7654; How., § 9236; CL 1897, § 11307; CL 1915, § 14974; and CL 1929, § 16565.

750.424 Subornation of perjury.

Sec. 424. Subornation of perjury—any person who shall be guilty of subornation of perjury, by procuring another person to commit the crime of perjury, shall be punished as provided in the next preceding section.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.424.
Former law: See section 3 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5822; CL 1871, § 7655; How., § 9237; CL 1897, § 11307; CL 1915, § 14974; and CL 1929, § 16565.




750.425 Inciting or procuring one to commit perjury.

Sec. 425. Inciting or procuring one to commit perjury—Any person who shall endeavor to incite or procure any person to commit the crime of perjury, though no perjury be committed, shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 5 years.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.425.
Former law: See section 4 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5823; CL 1871, § 7656; How., § 9239; CL 1897, § 11309; CL
1915, § 14975; and CL 1929, § 16566.


750.426 Court reasonably believes perjury committed.Sec. 426. Proceeding when court reasonably believes perjury has been committed—Whenever it shall appear to any court of record that any witness or party who has been legally sworn and examined or has made an affidavit in any proceeding in a court of justice, has testified in such a manner as to induce a reasonable presumption that he has been guilty of perjury therein,

the court may immediately commit such witness or party, by an order or process for that purpose, or may take a recognizance with sureties, for his appearing to answer to an indictment for perjury; and thereupon the witness to establish such perjury may, if present, be bound over to the proper court, and notice of the proceedings shall forthwith be given to the prosecuting Attorney.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.426.
Rendered Wednesday, July 28, 2010 Page 1 Michigan Compiled Laws Complete Through PA 132 of 2010

Legislative Council, State of Michigan Courtesy of www.legislature.mi.gov Former law: See section 5 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5824; CL 1871, § 7657; How., § 9239; CL 1897, § 11309; CL 1915, § 14976; and CL 1929, § 16567.

750.427 Perjury trial; securing and detaining papers.

Sec. 427. Securing and detaining papers, etc., necessary in perjury trial—If, in any proceeding in a court of justice, in which perjury shall be reasonably presumed, as aforesaid, any papers, books, or documents shall have been produced, which shall be deemed necessary to be used on any prosecution for such perjury, the court may, by order, detain the same from the person producing them so long as may be necessary in order to their being used in such prosecution.

History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931;CL 1948, 750.427.
Former law: See section 6 of Ch. 156 of R.S. 1846, being CL 1857, § 5825; CL 1871, § 7658; How., § 9240; CL 1897, § 11310; CL 1915, § 14977; and CL 1929, § 16568.
Rendered Penalty for Filing a False Police Report in Michigan
By Mardi Link, eHow Contributor
updated: September 21, 2009

I want to do this!To file a false police report in Michigan is a crime. A person who intentionally makes a false report of a crime or causes a false report to be made by another person may be found guilty of either a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances of the particular incident.

Michigan Law

1. Section 750.411a of the Michigan Penal Code, states that, "a person who intentionally makes a false report of the commission of a crime . . . to a peace officer, police agency of this state or of a local unit of government, 9-1-1 operator, or any other governmental employee . . . is guilty of a crime." The law also provides that a person who causes someone else to make a false report can be considered guilty of a crime as well.

Filing a false police report also falls under filing a false complaint to the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry service a local unit of government or government employee.

The following committed Perjury and the above and committed an illegal act to acquire illegal funds and property from George Lyons and his company. .

A. James and Betty Steeber: Owes Lyons $35,000.00

B. Ronald and Virginia Storzbach

Now following PEOPLE WHO FOLLOWED the Storzbach’s illegal and criminal lead the following in their illegal and criminal thinking that they could protect their lies.

Because of the Storzbach’s lies, these criminals also past clients thinking the Storzbach’s were telling the truth. But they were not. And neither were the past clients were telling the truth.

The criminal or past clients thinking their lies would be protected by Storzbach’s statements. The past clients thought their lies would be protected.

C. Richard and Ann Friberg. The State of Michigan Consumer & Industry founded that the Friberg’s were lying in their complaint. And sent a letter to George Lyons and his company did NO VIOLATIONS AGAINST THE FRIBERG’S.

But this finding was too late. It was sent one year after the Friberg’s using their false complaint to Complaint about George Lyons and his company to C & I.

D. George Lyons did not have the findings of the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services. See attached document from the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services.

E. George Lyons has an audio tapes of the Friberg stating they wanted out of the building contract with George Lyons. Because they were being transferred to
Gordville, Virginia. The Building contract with Lyons Builders, Inc. and Richard and Ann Friberg’s was terminated. by the Friberg's.

F. Because this evidence was hidden from George Lyons but recovered in 2007. This also shows that George Lyons used over $166,000.00 of his own money to finish this project.

G. George Lyons was illegally force to close by Friberg’s false lawsuit which he illegally acquire funds from that closing. Along with the following people who to acquire illegal funds from said closing.

H. Ronald and Virginia Storzbach-$ 25,000.00+ Steeber’s $35,000.00+ Patricia Ann Lyons $10,000.00+ The Real Estate commission that was not for sale by George Lyons and his company. But was illegal forced to sell because of Friberg’s false lawsuit.

Court Receiver Dale Cooper his commission. Attorney Cooper thru audio tapes committed fraud and obstruction of justice. To the Livingston County Court.

I. David and Carrie Feeback: $87,000.00 owed to George Lyons and his company. Thru audio tapes. The Feeback’s stated they paid George Lyons and his company $87,000.00 by his David Feeback’s handwritten sworn statement.

J. Feeback’s has to come forth and face the audio tape conversation with George Lyons and produce the $87,000.00 checks that he stated in the sworn statement that he paid George Lyons and his company. If the Feeback’s cannot produce these check’s a lien will be filed against the Feeback’s property.

A Forfeiture will be filed by George Lyons against Feeback’s property. To pay George Lyons and his company back his $87,000.00 plus interest. Also criminal charges will be filed by George Lyons against the Feeback’s

K. Ex-wife Patricia Ann Lyons stole funds from the closing on Lot 88 Arrowhead subdivision, aka 5640 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. her interference caused George Lyons and his company to lose over $166,000.00 from said closing.

Patti conspired with Karl and Marian Kopp to hide evidence from George Lyons. Evidence that would prove that these people stole over $700,000.00 + from George Lyons and his company. There is more…

L. Karl and Marian Kopp filed a false forfeiture on George Lyons marital home. By stating that George Lyons never made any payments toward a loan. In the recovery of the evidence, George Lyons recovered a $24,000.00 check proving that the Kopp filed a false lawsuit/forfeiture against George Lyons marital home. See copy of check made out to Karl and Marian Kopp which states FOR PAYMENT ON CAMELOT

Proving overwhelming that George Lyons did in fact made payments on the loan and that George Lyons was totally paid up.

Thru audio tapes conversations and documents proves that the Kopp’s did in fact file a false lawsuit/forfeiture against George Lyons and that they did in fact commit perjury and a criminal acts to criminally acquire George Lyons marital home. There is more…

M.Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde: Framed George Lyons and his company for False N.S.F. charges. To steal money from George Lyons and his company. There is more including audio tapes.

N.Ivo and Heather Marcich: Framed George Lyons and his company for False N.S.F. charges. To steal money from George Lyons and his company. There is more including audio tapes.

Because the above people and who made fraudulent complaints to the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services, and filed fraudulent lawsuit. Too illegally and criminally to remove George Lyons Residential Builders License and Real Estate broker’s license thru Perjury.

The Lost of income is overwhelming for George Lyons and his Companies. These illegal actions of these people stop George Lyons and his company from having his
Due Process of Law. And stopped George Lyons and his company from having any funds to acquire an Attorney to fight these criminals and their attorney’s.


CONTINUE: Misdemeanor/Felony Charges

2.The charges levied against a person accused of filing a false police report in Michigan are specifically tailored to the type of crime that was reported. For example, a person who files a false police report stating that a misdemeanor has occurred can be charged with a misdemeanor offense.

3.If the false report claims a felony was committed, the person who makes that report can be charged with a felony. In theory, additional charges of perjury may also apply if the case goes to court and the accused testifies falsely.

4.Thru the State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Service and the past clients filing false complaints (false report claims) did in fact committed a felony against George Lyons and his companies.

Punishment

The making of a false police report is taken seriously in Michigan. Punishment for a conviction of this crime depends upon whether the crime falsely reported was a misdemeanor or a felony. Misdemeanors carry a penalty of not more than 93 days in jail and not more than a $500 fine, or both.

The penalty for felony convictions is not more than four years in jail and not more than a $2,000 fine, or both.

Obstruction of Justice by the above people.

Obstruction of justice is the crime of interfering with the administration and due process of the law, including any criminal proceeding or investigation. Obstruction can be either a federal crime or a state crime, depending on the type of proceeding interfered with. To be guilty of obstruction of justice, a person must have knowledge of an investigation or proceeding and attempt to influence it.

The definition of obstruction is very broad and includes any interference with the application of the law, so there are many offenses that can be considered obstruction of justice. Some examples include:

• Lying to police during questioning; Making statements to police or to representative of the State of Michigan representative of Consumer & Industry services. And illegally criminally removing George Lyons and companies Residential Builders and Real Estate Broker’s license by making false and misleading statements. To acquire illegal funds from George Lyons and his companies.

• Falsifying or destroying documents sought by the police during an investigation;

• This was done by Ex-wife Patricia Ann Lyons and Karl and Marian Kopp to illegal commit forfeiture of 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan. Attempting to steal and hiding evidence from George Lyons and his company. There motive was to steal 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan from George Lyons. Appraised in 1996 for $800,000.00

• Attempting to influence a jury or witness.
The right of individuals to remain silent only allows them to refuse to answer police questions. If they answer and lie, this is not protected and is obstruction.

Penalty for Obstruction of Justice.

The above committed obstruction of Justice against George Lyons and his companies by their illegal and criminal acts.

Since there are so many offenses that can constitute obstruction of justice, the penalty will vary based on the severity of the offense. Penalties can range from simple fines to jail time of up to ten years.

The above people believe that they got away with their illegal and criminal acts against George Lyons and his company. That the Statue of Limitation protected them in their illegal act.

These people would be wrong in their thinking. These illegal and criminal acts fall under equitable tolling protecting George Lyons and his companies.

Equitable tolling

Definition - Noun
: a doctrine or principle of tort law: a statute of limitations will not bar a claim if despite use of due diligence the plaintiff did not or could not discover the injury until after the expiration of the limitations period.
George Lyons and his company are in acting Equitable tolling for George Lyons and his companies against the illegal actions of the above people.

The above people committed A frame up or setup is an American term referring to the act of framing someone, that is, providing false evidence or false testimony in order to falsely prove someone guilty of a crime.[1] It is possibly derived from the English word frame, meaning to cause someone innocent to appear guilty by "putting the person in a picture frame of suspicion".[citation needed]

Sometimes the person who is framing someone else is the actual perpetrator of the crime. In other cases it is an attempt by law enforcement to get around due process. Motives include getting rid of political dissidents or "correcting" what they see as the court's mistake. Some lawbreakers will try to claim they were framed as a defense strategy. The term comes from the criminal subculture, with an early version being the claim that "someone is trying to put me in the frame," as in a picture frame.[citation needed]

Example: Frame-ups in labor disputes sometimes swings public opinion one way or the other. During a strike in Lawrence, Massachusetts, police acting on a tip discovered dynamite and blamed it on the union.

National media echoed an anti-union message. Later the police revealed that the dynamite had been wrapped in a magazine addressed to the son of the former mayor. The man had received an unexplained payment from the largest of the employers. Exposed, the plot swung public sympathy to the union.

[2]Frame-ups are often part of conspiracy theories. For example, there were frame-up accusations in the anthrax incident involving the United States Postal Service.[3]
Because of the illegal and criminal acts of the above people they STOP George Lyons and his company from Due process of Law.

Also the above item Framing of George Lyons and his company. Was done by Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde and Ivo and Heather Marcich. In this false N.S.F. Charges filed by the Livingston County Prosecutor’s office. Against George Lyons.

See evidence showing that Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde and Ivo and Heather Marcich did in fact caused the N.S.F. False charges against George Lyons and his company.
This in Fact was a criminal act caused by Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde and Ivo and Heather Marcich. This illegal act of these people causes George Lyons to face false charges of N.S.F. charges and 5 years of probation.

Per the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution-George Lyons and his companies was denied Due Process of Law…Because of these people.
The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868 as one of the Reconstruction Amendments.

Its Citizenship Clause provides a broad definition of citizenship that overruled the decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which held that blacks could not be citizens of the United States.

Its Due Process Clause prohibits state and local governments from depriving persons (individual and corporate) of life, liberty, or property without certain steps being taken. This clause has been used to make most of the Bill of Rights applicable to the states, as well as to recognize substantive rights and procedural rights.

Its Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction. This clause later became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court decision which precipitated the dismantling of racial segregation in the United States.

The amendment also includes a number of clauses dealing with the Confederacy and its officials.

These subjects fall under Due process of Law…or the Fifth Amendment.
Main article: Due process in the United States

The Fifth Amendment prevents individuals from being deprived of life, liberty, or property without "due process of law.

(George Lyons was deprived of Due Process of Law. By the Above people and others.)

“Due process extends to all persons and corporate entities. The Fourteenth Amendment explicitly binds the states with due process protections, through selective incorporation. Fifth Amendment due process protection has not always been granted to corporations, but was first applied to corporations in 1893 by the Supreme Court in Noble v. Union River Logging 147 U.S. 165. This was not long after the Supreme Court first granted 14th Amendment protection to corporations in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad in 1886.

The Fifth Amendment applies to the federal government (see Barron v. Baltimore), and the Fourteenth Amendment, by its own terms, applies against the States. While the Fifth Amendment includes a due process clause.

However, in Bolling v. Sharpe 347 U.S. 497 (1954), the Supreme Court averred that it was absurd that the Constitution could deny the states the power to abridge equal protection of the laws, yet permit that power to the Congress.


"[T]he concepts of equal protection and due process, both stemming from our American ideal of fairness, are not mutually exclusive," reasoned Chief Justice Earl Warren. The Court thus interpreted the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause to include an equal protection element but has continued to hold that there is a difference between due process and equal protection in its fourteenth amendment jurisprudence.
Money that was stolen from and owed to George Lyons and his company by the below people.

James and Betty Steeber $ 35,000.00
Ronald and Virginia Storzbach $155,715.71
Mike Coad and Jamie Spiele $ 8,000.00
David and Carrie Feeback $ 87,000.00
Richard and Ann Friberg $166,000.00
Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde $162,566.74
Ivo and Heather Marcich $141,646.95

TOTAL $755,929.40


GREED

After stealing the above money from George Lyons and his companies. The following people continue to steal money from George Lyons and his Companies.
Ronald and Virginia Storzbach file a fraudulent judgment in the amount of
$55,000.00. +

Curt and Mary Ann Lalonde: file a fraudulent judgment approx $75,000.00 +

Ivo and Heather Marcich: filed a fraudulent judgment approx. $45,000.00 +
The above shows just plain greed.

FEAR STARTED THE FALSE FORFITURE, BUT IT WAS STILL A CRIMINAL ACT.

1.Because of the above and their illegal and criminal acts. And through audio tapes with Marian Kopp. Mrs. Kopp stated the reason that the Kopp’s committed a fraudulent forfeiture against George Lyons to illegally acquire 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan.

2.Was the FEAR OF THE ABOVE PEOPLE? AND THEIR ACQUIRING ILLEGAL JUDGMENTS AGAINST GEORGE LYONS AND HIS COMPANY. OF WHICH THEY COULD THEN FILE FALSE LIEN AGAINST 1194 CAMELOT, PINCKNEY, MICHIGAN.

3.That is the reason the Kopp’s filed a fraudulent forfeiture against George Lyons and 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan. And made a false police report against George Lyons for Entering without permission.

1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan George Lyons marital home, was stolen from George Lyons by Karl and Marian Kopp. Appraised out for $800,000.00 in 1996.

Lot 88 Arrowhead Subdivision, AKA 5640 Shoshoni Pass; Pinckney, Michigan was stolen by Ex-wife Patricia Ann Lyons. Worth $55,000.00 in 1997. And causing George Lyons and his company to loss over $166,000.00 because of her illegal and criminal interference.

Patricia Lyons then stole Lot 2 Betty Lyons Lane, Pinckney, Michigan thru fraudulent statements and committing Perjury Ex-wife Patricia Ann Lyons stole from George Lyons company Lyons Builders, Inc. Worth at the time $ 65,000.00.

ALL OF THE ABOVE COMMITTED PERJURY TO THE STATE OF MICHIGAN CONSUMER & INDUSTRY SERVICES AND THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY COURT SYSTEM TO ILLEGALLY AND CRIMINALLY ACQUIRE THE ABOVE FUNDS FROM GEORGE LYONS AND HIS COMPANY.

The reason this is being brought forth now is that Ex-Wife and Karl and Marian Kopp hidden evidence from George Lyons and his company.

Which they tried to destroy said evidence to wrongfully acquire 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan. Through audio tapes and transcripts of Ex-wife Patricia Ann Lyons stating that she thru everything of George Lyons and his company out in the garbage.

But through C&C dumpster company. The Driver Call George Lyons in 2007 Stating “George who going to pay for the dumpster you or Patti. George Lyons informed the driver what Patti and the Kopp’s did. And the Driver stated George when I remove the Dumpster off the Property. It becomes my property. What driveway do you what me to drop off the dumpster.

George Lyons recovered all the clients’ evidence including audio tapes. That on every conversation’s with the above client’s. Proving their criminal acts and Perjury against George Lyons and his company.

Again George Lyons audio taped any and all meetings and conversations with these Client’s, subcontractors, and material handler’s. Which was recovered in 2007.




OTHER EVIDENCE WAS ACQUIRED THRU THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION IN 2010 FROM ALL THE POLICING AGENCIES IN LIVINGSTON COUNTY. AGAINST PEOPLE MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS AND POLICE REPORTS TO THESE AGENCY.TO ILLEGALLY AND CRIMINALLY SUPPORT THERE ILLEGAL FRAMING OF GEORGE LYONS AND HIS COMPANIES
There is more;

respectfully
George Lyons

See how the corruption of Livingston County court system were included in these allegations.

THERE IS OVERWHELMING A LOT MORE…THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO BE NOT KNOWN, BUT ARE WILLING TO COME FORTH UNDER THE State of Michigan whistleblower protection act§15.361 et seq. and case law.

Please review: findingjusticeforpeople.blogspot.com