STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE 30th JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT OF (Ingham County)
313 W. KALAMAZOO,LANSING MICHIGAN, 48933
517-483-6500
GEORGE EDWARD LYONS HONORABLE JUDGE BEVERLEY NETTLES-NICKERSON
1711 PARKER ROAD Case no. 04-83-MZ
DEXTER, MICHIGAN 48130
734-878-0825
PLAINTIFF
-V-
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT CONSUMER & INDUSTRY SERVICES
BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL SERVICES
LICENSING DIVISION
Real Estate-Broker and Salesperson License
And
Residential Builders License
P.O.Box 30245
Lansing, Michigan 48909
517-241-9254
DEFENDANTS
There are other pending or unresolved actions of Plaintiff is making against the Defendants, and Defendants filing arising out of this transaction or occurrence alleged in the complaint.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, George Edward Lyons, and for this Complaint, state:
COMMON ALLEGATIONS
1. Plaintiff, George Edward Lyons is a resident of Lima Township,
Washtenaw County, Michigan.
2. Defendants, State of Michigan, Consumer & Industry Services are working, in Ingham County, Michigan.
3. The actions of the Defendants, which give rise to this complaint, took place in Ingham County, of Michigan.
4. Venue is proper in the Circuit Court of Ingham County.
COUNT I-Malicious Prosecution
5. Defendants State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Service against Plaintiff George Lyons, Lyons Builders, Inc. and Lyons Inc. located at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. 48169. Defendants suppressed or withhold evidence from the following cases.
Pertaining to the following, cases Builders Licensing permanent ID no. 2102095976 Lyons Builders, Inc. or any other Builders license related to Plaintiff George Edward Lyons.
DOCKET NO. 95-0693 COMPLAINT NO. 21-94-0001-00
The Storzbach complaint. And George Lyons evidence is overwhelming and is too large to copy, it the size of New York telephone book. This evidence of innocents was filed prior to and formal complaint of final order. And will be presented upon request. This is Storzbach’s fabercated fraudulent complaint to State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services Enforcement division.
DOCKET NO. 98-0107 COMPLAINT NO. 21-96-0232-00
DOCKET NO. 98-0108 COMPLAINT NO. 21-96-0232-01
DOCKET NO. 1999-3683 COMPLAINT NO. 89-97-3961-00
DOCKET NO. 1999-3682 COMPLAINT NO. 89-97-3164-00
DOCKET NO. 1999-3674 COMPLAINT NO. 89-97-3962-00
DOCKET NO. 1999-3679 COMPLAINT NO. 89-97-3163-00
The Plaintiff has over 20+ bank boxes of evidence that was presented to State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Service. Proving Plaintiff George Lyons innocence. Along with audiotape conversations and transcripts.
6. Pertaining to the following case Real Estate Brokers & Salesperson licensing permanent ID no. 650120239 George Edward Lyons and Lyons, Inc. license or any other license related to George Edward Lyons.DOCKET NO. 1999-3684 COMPLAINT NO. 65-98-0345-00
See Honorable Administration Judge Goldstein Hearing Report. And
Through the freedom of information the false copy of George Lyons, application for Brokers License. Proving that the Board of Real Estate Brokers and Salespersons illegally by the Defendants wrongly removed George Lyons Brokers License.
That the Defendant Consumer & Industry services doctor the Plaintiff Application, from Yes to No. Plaintiff has overwhelming evidence this is true. And the Defendant preformed falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff.
With the huge losses to Plaintiff. The actions of the Defendants, State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services supported the Past Clients to Framed George Lyons for false N.S.F. checks.
Defendant COUNT II-SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE AND JOINT LIABILITY
7. That the Defendants, had DOCTOR, AND SUPPRESSSION OF EVIDENCE: the refusal to produce evidence or to allow evidence to be produced for use in litigation. Suppression of evidence refers most commonly to the sanction in a civil or criminal cases for an unreasonable search or seizure that violates a defendant’s constitutional rights. In 1914, the U.S. Supreme Court held that illegally seized evidence must be excluded from use in criminal trials.232 U.S. 383, In 1961, the Courts expanded the exclusionary rule to include state criminal trials, 367 U.S. 643.
8. This evidence was presented to the Defendants before any hearings, or before any final orders were issued against Plaintiff George Lyons, Lyons Builders, Inc or Lyons Inc.
9. Suppression of evidence refers either to a party’s refusal to produce evidence or withhold evidence to interference by a party with the production of evidence when another party seeks the evidence pursuant to the law. In evidence may constitute an admission the evidence is unfavorable to the party refusing to product it. McCormick, Evidence 273 (2d ed. 1972
COUNTIII-COLLISION,OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, JOINT LIABILITY, AND MALPRACTICE.
The Defendants may be possibly being charged with receiving evidence and having full knowledge that the Plaintiff was being railroaded. By the defendants, may possibility charged for the following in collision, obstruction of justice, and malicious prosecution, malpractice and the Defendant preformed falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff.
10. In addition, are in joint liability by the Defendants employees.
DEFENDANTS HAD NO JURISDICTION PER ALL BUILDING CONTRACTS
11. On the false filing a false complaint, all past clients had in there contract arbitration clauses in there building contract and Defendants did not or did review evidence, but withheld evidence. That the Defendant had no jurisdiction until the clients went through arbitration.
12. The Plaintiff believes these actions of the Defendants made actions that supported a ripple effect of false police reports, and supported the past clients to receive illegal gains against the plaintiff.
13. In addition, the past clients of the Plaintiff that made false complaints to the Defendants. That the Defendants had full knowledge of the Plaintiffs innocents before any formal complaints, or final orders were presented.
14. Defendants were in collusion against Plaintiff George Edward Lyons and his companies to illegally acquiring, illegal judgments through Consumer & Industry services, and the Livingston County Court system, of Michigan.
15. Plaintiff’s over the years has proven to Defendants that the past clients made fraudulent complaints against the Plaintiffs.
16. That the past clients were criminally embezzling money from the Plaintiff’s.
The Defendant’s are responsible to protect the public; the Plaintiff’s is the public. Nevertheless, the Defendant’s were protecting their illegal gains on fraudulent fines that they made against the Plaintiff’s of over $ 27,000.00 +. Moreover, the illegal gains of the past clients of $806,000.00 +. And not preformed falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff.
17. Plaintiffs has evidence of a criminal nature against Defendants under the proper circumstances, will be presented to this honorable court.
18. That the Defendant over the many years has respectively submitted overwhelming evidence, to many of the employees proving the Plaintiffs innocence. And a deaf ear has been placed against the Plaintiffs by the Defendant so they could protect their illegal gains.
COUNT IV-FRAUDULENT SUPPORT OF PERJURY FOR THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY COURT SYSTEM
19. Evidence has been obtained proving that Defendants committed fraudulent actions against the Plaintiffs, to support past clients illegal actions.
20. The defendant placed the Plaintiffs in a possession of homeless possession, and non-working possession, by illegally removing both builders and real estate brokers license from having the Plaintiff’s money to have a legal representative to fight the criminal actions of the Defendant’s and the past clients. The Plaintiff was to receive his broker’s license, May 2003 back because of illegal doctoring (falsification) of the Plaintiff’s licensing application, which was never to be revoke because of the Defendant’s illegal actions.
DEFENDANTS MOTIVE
21. This writer’s belief is that Defendants conspired with Livingston County Prosecutors, and the Livingston County court system because of false allegations and illegal judgments.
22. Fraudulent formal complaints and final orders, against the Plaintiff’s, that the Defendants illegal actions caused major losses in Plaintiffs life and career.
23. Because of the Defendants falsification of the Plaintiff application, this action forced Plaintiff to live in a car for 4 years, along with living in an abandon building for 1 year. Moreover, placing the Plaintiff’s life in harms way.
24. Causing dissolving of 20-year marriage stress to the point of a divorce. In addition, lose of his children.
25. In addition, stopping the Plaintiff George Lyons from having proper legal representation to fight the false judgments that were illegal placed against the Plaintiff George Lyons and his companies with no money.
26. That supported Livingston County Prosecutors of Livingston County and lawyer’s illegal actions, and Livingston County court system.
27. Protecting Livingston County Court system, and the first complainant, Ronald and Virginia Storzbach, Ronald Storzbach is a police officer for Hamburg Township police department, along with other past clients.
28. Because of the Defendants falsification actions, cause severe reputation destruction and huge losses of funds to Plaintiffs George Lyons and his companies.
29. Actions of the Defendants, Malicious Prosecution, Malpractice, collusion, falsification of documents, has joint liability in this matter, and because of the Defendant ripple effect, illegal actions, caused Plaintiffs to face Malicious arrest, and Malicious Prosecution, And placed Plaintiff in Harm-way, and set-up past clients to embezzle funds from the Plaintiffs and his companies.
VIOLATION OF THE DEFENDANTS MICHIGAN CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT AND FALSE SUPPORT OF THE BUILDER LIEN ACT.
The Plaintiffs is governed by the rules and regulations of the Michigan Consumer Protection act. The Defendants did not follow the consumer protection act or standards, in placing illegal formal complaints and final orders against the Plaintiff. Moreover, illegally doctoring the Plaintiff Brokers application, which illegal cause the lose of the Plaintiff’s Brokers License. But Defendants preformed falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff to illegally control the plaintiff.
30.
MISLEADING STATEMENTS OF DEFENDANTS
31. See audiotapes on Defendants employees.
32. After looking back by the actions of Defendants employees. Defendant employees made false allegations to control Plaintiff’s George Edward Lyons and his companies. And to protect past clients.
In addition, to fraudulently cause a ripple effect of embezzlements against the Plaintiffs George Lyons, Lyons Builders, Inc. and Lyons Inc. By the Defendants appro. $27,000.00 + in false fines fraudulently filed by the Defendants. And the past clients illegal gains of $806,000.00+. By the Defendant performing falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff.
33. The marital home of Plaintiff’s property in question lost, 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan 48130 PLAINTIFF LOSE OF INCOME $14,000,000.00+ since 1994
34. The Plaintiff George Lyons has lost major income over the years because the illegal actions and of the Defendants against the Plaintiff and his companies. (See graph).
35. Defendants State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services should be held responsible for the Plaintiff losses and pay Plaintiff George Lyons back on all losses.
Damages Against George Lyons
36. Plaintiff incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 through 35.
37. Defendant’s fraudulent representations were made intentionally and maliciously with joint liability, and have caused Plaintiff’s to suffer loss of income, humiliation, outrage, lose of a 20 year marriage, deformation of character, lose of Plaintiff Marital Home, at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan 48169, loss of income through homes that the Plaintiff’s constructed, and mental stress, and indignation. Because of the falsification of the Plaintiff’s application, and other illegal actions.
38. Plaintiff should be entitled to damages plus trebel damages as results of Defendants outrageous illegal behavior.
39. As a result, of Defendant’s false misrepresentations, Plaintiff has suffered substantial economic losses.
Wherefore, Plaintiff’s George Edward Lyons and his companies, request this honorable court enter judgments in his favor against the Defendants State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Services for their illegal actions in the losses of Plaintiff’s builders income amount of $14,000,000.00+ plus trebel damages, and replace 5460 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. and 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan to at today’s market value against the Defendants. Plaintiff’s losses this does include Real Estate income except for the possible clients, and will be enter later.
Return of the Plaintiff’s home at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. 48169 with clear title.
Because of ripple effect of the Defendants. Losses of income from all the past clients fraudulently received of the Plaintiff’s builder’s income.
PLAINTIFF DEMANDS THE Return immediate Plaintiffs Builders License, and Real Estate brokers license. Expunge all fines, levied against the Plaintiff’s licenses any and all, Past and Present.
In addition, completely repair the Plaintiff’s credit to Plaintiff’s satisfaction.
In addition, costs and attorney fees so wrongfully incurred as a results of the Defendant’s illegal actions.
25 to 30 agents were ready to work for and did not work for the Plaintiff, George Lyons; these people should be reimbursed for the money they lost, because of the illegal actions of the Defendants.
Plaintiff’s George Edward Lyons request this honorable court award him damages and trebel damages, from the Defendants State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Services for mental stress.
That was wrongfully incurred as results of Defendant’s egregious behavior.
That this evidence is also being transferred to the Supreme Court investigation team for possible judicial misconduct. Included the Attorney Grievance committee, and judicial tenure committee.
Sunday, June 20, 2004
By_______________________________
Plaintiff: George Edward Lyons
1711 Parker Road
Dexter, Michigan 48130
734-878-0825
prideoflyons@provide.net
IN THE 30th JUDICAL CIRCUIT COURT OF (Ingham County)
313 W. KALAMAZOO,LANSING MICHIGAN, 48933
517-483-6500
GEORGE EDWARD LYONS HONORABLE JUDGE BEVERLEY NETTLES-NICKERSON
1711 PARKER ROAD Case no. 04-83-MZ
DEXTER, MICHIGAN 48130
734-878-0825
PLAINTIFF
-V-
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT CONSUMER & INDUSTRY SERVICES
BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL SERVICES
LICENSING DIVISION
Real Estate-Broker and Salesperson License
And
Residential Builders License
P.O.Box 30245
Lansing, Michigan 48909
517-241-9254
DEFENDANTS
There are other pending or unresolved actions of Plaintiff is making against the Defendants, and Defendants filing arising out of this transaction or occurrence alleged in the complaint.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, George Edward Lyons, and for this Complaint, state:
COMMON ALLEGATIONS
1. Plaintiff, George Edward Lyons is a resident of Lima Township,
Washtenaw County, Michigan.
2. Defendants, State of Michigan, Consumer & Industry Services are working, in Ingham County, Michigan.
3. The actions of the Defendants, which give rise to this complaint, took place in Ingham County, of Michigan.
4. Venue is proper in the Circuit Court of Ingham County.
COUNT I-Malicious Prosecution
5. Defendants State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Service against Plaintiff George Lyons, Lyons Builders, Inc. and Lyons Inc. located at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. 48169. Defendants suppressed or withhold evidence from the following cases.
Pertaining to the following, cases Builders Licensing permanent ID no. 2102095976 Lyons Builders, Inc. or any other Builders license related to Plaintiff George Edward Lyons.
DOCKET NO. 95-0693 COMPLAINT NO. 21-94-0001-00
The Storzbach complaint. And George Lyons evidence is overwhelming and is too large to copy, it the size of New York telephone book. This evidence of innocents was filed prior to and formal complaint of final order. And will be presented upon request. This is Storzbach’s fabercated fraudulent complaint to State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services Enforcement division.
DOCKET NO. 98-0107 COMPLAINT NO. 21-96-0232-00
DOCKET NO. 98-0108 COMPLAINT NO. 21-96-0232-01
DOCKET NO. 1999-3683 COMPLAINT NO. 89-97-3961-00
DOCKET NO. 1999-3682 COMPLAINT NO. 89-97-3164-00
DOCKET NO. 1999-3674 COMPLAINT NO. 89-97-3962-00
DOCKET NO. 1999-3679 COMPLAINT NO. 89-97-3163-00
The Plaintiff has over 20+ bank boxes of evidence that was presented to State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Service. Proving Plaintiff George Lyons innocence. Along with audiotape conversations and transcripts.
6. Pertaining to the following case Real Estate Brokers & Salesperson licensing permanent ID no. 650120239 George Edward Lyons and Lyons, Inc. license or any other license related to George Edward Lyons.DOCKET NO. 1999-3684 COMPLAINT NO. 65-98-0345-00
See Honorable Administration Judge Goldstein Hearing Report. And
Through the freedom of information the false copy of George Lyons, application for Brokers License. Proving that the Board of Real Estate Brokers and Salespersons illegally by the Defendants wrongly removed George Lyons Brokers License.
That the Defendant Consumer & Industry services doctor the Plaintiff Application, from Yes to No. Plaintiff has overwhelming evidence this is true. And the Defendant preformed falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff.
With the huge losses to Plaintiff. The actions of the Defendants, State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services supported the Past Clients to Framed George Lyons for false N.S.F. checks.
Defendant COUNT II-SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE AND JOINT LIABILITY
7. That the Defendants, had DOCTOR, AND SUPPRESSSION OF EVIDENCE: the refusal to produce evidence or to allow evidence to be produced for use in litigation. Suppression of evidence refers most commonly to the sanction in a civil or criminal cases for an unreasonable search or seizure that violates a defendant’s constitutional rights. In 1914, the U.S. Supreme Court held that illegally seized evidence must be excluded from use in criminal trials.232 U.S. 383, In 1961, the Courts expanded the exclusionary rule to include state criminal trials, 367 U.S. 643.
8. This evidence was presented to the Defendants before any hearings, or before any final orders were issued against Plaintiff George Lyons, Lyons Builders, Inc or Lyons Inc.
9. Suppression of evidence refers either to a party’s refusal to produce evidence or withhold evidence to interference by a party with the production of evidence when another party seeks the evidence pursuant to the law. In evidence may constitute an admission the evidence is unfavorable to the party refusing to product it. McCormick, Evidence 273 (2d ed. 1972
COUNTIII-COLLISION,OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, JOINT LIABILITY, AND MALPRACTICE.
The Defendants may be possibly being charged with receiving evidence and having full knowledge that the Plaintiff was being railroaded. By the defendants, may possibility charged for the following in collision, obstruction of justice, and malicious prosecution, malpractice and the Defendant preformed falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff.
10. In addition, are in joint liability by the Defendants employees.
DEFENDANTS HAD NO JURISDICTION PER ALL BUILDING CONTRACTS
11. On the false filing a false complaint, all past clients had in there contract arbitration clauses in there building contract and Defendants did not or did review evidence, but withheld evidence. That the Defendant had no jurisdiction until the clients went through arbitration.
12. The Plaintiff believes these actions of the Defendants made actions that supported a ripple effect of false police reports, and supported the past clients to receive illegal gains against the plaintiff.
13. In addition, the past clients of the Plaintiff that made false complaints to the Defendants. That the Defendants had full knowledge of the Plaintiffs innocents before any formal complaints, or final orders were presented.
14. Defendants were in collusion against Plaintiff George Edward Lyons and his companies to illegally acquiring, illegal judgments through Consumer & Industry services, and the Livingston County Court system, of Michigan.
15. Plaintiff’s over the years has proven to Defendants that the past clients made fraudulent complaints against the Plaintiffs.
16. That the past clients were criminally embezzling money from the Plaintiff’s.
The Defendant’s are responsible to protect the public; the Plaintiff’s is the public. Nevertheless, the Defendant’s were protecting their illegal gains on fraudulent fines that they made against the Plaintiff’s of over $ 27,000.00 +. Moreover, the illegal gains of the past clients of $806,000.00 +. And not preformed falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff.
17. Plaintiffs has evidence of a criminal nature against Defendants under the proper circumstances, will be presented to this honorable court.
18. That the Defendant over the many years has respectively submitted overwhelming evidence, to many of the employees proving the Plaintiffs innocence. And a deaf ear has been placed against the Plaintiffs by the Defendant so they could protect their illegal gains.
COUNT IV-FRAUDULENT SUPPORT OF PERJURY FOR THE LIVINGSTON COUNTY COURT SYSTEM
19. Evidence has been obtained proving that Defendants committed fraudulent actions against the Plaintiffs, to support past clients illegal actions.
20. The defendant placed the Plaintiffs in a possession of homeless possession, and non-working possession, by illegally removing both builders and real estate brokers license from having the Plaintiff’s money to have a legal representative to fight the criminal actions of the Defendant’s and the past clients. The Plaintiff was to receive his broker’s license, May 2003 back because of illegal doctoring (falsification) of the Plaintiff’s licensing application, which was never to be revoke because of the Defendant’s illegal actions.
DEFENDANTS MOTIVE
21. This writer’s belief is that Defendants conspired with Livingston County Prosecutors, and the Livingston County court system because of false allegations and illegal judgments.
22. Fraudulent formal complaints and final orders, against the Plaintiff’s, that the Defendants illegal actions caused major losses in Plaintiffs life and career.
23. Because of the Defendants falsification of the Plaintiff application, this action forced Plaintiff to live in a car for 4 years, along with living in an abandon building for 1 year. Moreover, placing the Plaintiff’s life in harms way.
24. Causing dissolving of 20-year marriage stress to the point of a divorce. In addition, lose of his children.
25. In addition, stopping the Plaintiff George Lyons from having proper legal representation to fight the false judgments that were illegal placed against the Plaintiff George Lyons and his companies with no money.
26. That supported Livingston County Prosecutors of Livingston County and lawyer’s illegal actions, and Livingston County court system.
27. Protecting Livingston County Court system, and the first complainant, Ronald and Virginia Storzbach, Ronald Storzbach is a police officer for Hamburg Township police department, along with other past clients.
28. Because of the Defendants falsification actions, cause severe reputation destruction and huge losses of funds to Plaintiffs George Lyons and his companies.
29. Actions of the Defendants, Malicious Prosecution, Malpractice, collusion, falsification of documents, has joint liability in this matter, and because of the Defendant ripple effect, illegal actions, caused Plaintiffs to face Malicious arrest, and Malicious Prosecution, And placed Plaintiff in Harm-way, and set-up past clients to embezzle funds from the Plaintiffs and his companies.
VIOLATION OF THE DEFENDANTS MICHIGAN CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT AND FALSE SUPPORT OF THE BUILDER LIEN ACT.
The Plaintiffs is governed by the rules and regulations of the Michigan Consumer Protection act. The Defendants did not follow the consumer protection act or standards, in placing illegal formal complaints and final orders against the Plaintiff. Moreover, illegally doctoring the Plaintiff Brokers application, which illegal cause the lose of the Plaintiff’s Brokers License. But Defendants preformed falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff to illegally control the plaintiff.
30.
MISLEADING STATEMENTS OF DEFENDANTS
31. See audiotapes on Defendants employees.
32. After looking back by the actions of Defendants employees. Defendant employees made false allegations to control Plaintiff’s George Edward Lyons and his companies. And to protect past clients.
In addition, to fraudulently cause a ripple effect of embezzlements against the Plaintiffs George Lyons, Lyons Builders, Inc. and Lyons Inc. By the Defendants appro. $27,000.00 + in false fines fraudulently filed by the Defendants. And the past clients illegal gains of $806,000.00+. By the Defendant performing falsification of documents, against the Plaintiff.
33. The marital home of Plaintiff’s property in question lost, 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan 48130 PLAINTIFF LOSE OF INCOME $14,000,000.00+ since 1994
34. The Plaintiff George Lyons has lost major income over the years because the illegal actions and of the Defendants against the Plaintiff and his companies. (See graph).
35. Defendants State of Michigan Consumer & Industry services should be held responsible for the Plaintiff losses and pay Plaintiff George Lyons back on all losses.
Damages Against George Lyons
36. Plaintiff incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 through 35.
37. Defendant’s fraudulent representations were made intentionally and maliciously with joint liability, and have caused Plaintiff’s to suffer loss of income, humiliation, outrage, lose of a 20 year marriage, deformation of character, lose of Plaintiff Marital Home, at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan 48169, loss of income through homes that the Plaintiff’s constructed, and mental stress, and indignation. Because of the falsification of the Plaintiff’s application, and other illegal actions.
38. Plaintiff should be entitled to damages plus trebel damages as results of Defendants outrageous illegal behavior.
39. As a result, of Defendant’s false misrepresentations, Plaintiff has suffered substantial economic losses.
Wherefore, Plaintiff’s George Edward Lyons and his companies, request this honorable court enter judgments in his favor against the Defendants State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Services for their illegal actions in the losses of Plaintiff’s builders income amount of $14,000,000.00+ plus trebel damages, and replace 5460 Shoshoni Pass, Pinckney, Mi. and 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Michigan to at today’s market value against the Defendants. Plaintiff’s losses this does include Real Estate income except for the possible clients, and will be enter later.
Return of the Plaintiff’s home at 1194 Camelot, Pinckney, Mi. 48169 with clear title.
Because of ripple effect of the Defendants. Losses of income from all the past clients fraudulently received of the Plaintiff’s builder’s income.
PLAINTIFF DEMANDS THE Return immediate Plaintiffs Builders License, and Real Estate brokers license. Expunge all fines, levied against the Plaintiff’s licenses any and all, Past and Present.
In addition, completely repair the Plaintiff’s credit to Plaintiff’s satisfaction.
In addition, costs and attorney fees so wrongfully incurred as a results of the Defendant’s illegal actions.
25 to 30 agents were ready to work for and did not work for the Plaintiff, George Lyons; these people should be reimbursed for the money they lost, because of the illegal actions of the Defendants.
Plaintiff’s George Edward Lyons request this honorable court award him damages and trebel damages, from the Defendants State of Michigan Consumer & Industry Services for mental stress.
That was wrongfully incurred as results of Defendant’s egregious behavior.
That this evidence is also being transferred to the Supreme Court investigation team for possible judicial misconduct. Included the Attorney Grievance committee, and judicial tenure committee.
Sunday, June 20, 2004
By_______________________________
Plaintiff: George Edward Lyons
1711 Parker Road
Dexter, Michigan 48130
734-878-0825
prideoflyons@provide.net
No comments:
Post a Comment